If you think the original YESTERDAY AND TODAY cover was controversial,another one involving John Lennon surpasses that:His and Yoko Ono's TWO VIRGINS. The pair,stark naked is what shocked many. Many copies were immediately recalled and returned with concealing barriers to record stores. Another one is Guns 'N Roses' APPETITE FOR DESTRUCTION. The original cover featured such unsightly animation. Those should have been pasted over with the cross cover. But no one thought about that.
@MrBeatles4life I'm pretty sure there is a way to tell if you concentrate closely on the cover so I wouldn't tear it unless you see the other cover through the pasted one.
Arent they worth more money un-peeled due to the circumstances that the unpeeled ones are being peeled?
ZombiesFan95 7 months ago
If you think the original YESTERDAY AND TODAY cover was controversial,another one involving John Lennon surpasses that:His and Yoko Ono's TWO VIRGINS. The pair,stark naked is what shocked many. Many copies were immediately recalled and returned with concealing barriers to record stores. Another one is Guns 'N Roses' APPETITE FOR DESTRUCTION. The original cover featured such unsightly animation. Those should have been pasted over with the cross cover. But no one thought about that.
arhuxtable 8 months ago
This is awesome. Were did you get it, and how much was it?
HardDaysNight44 9 months ago
I could see 30 percent of the screen.Useless..
1980Invasiontour 1 year ago
@fweefwee91 yeah...fack all of it.
lcozzarelli 1 year ago
@fweefwee91 fack?
GoucheGizmo 1 year ago
If I was alive in the 60's, Id still get it! I wouldnt've cared about the cover.
GamecubeLPs 1 year ago
all right the babies are fack dolls and the meatt well cow or fack meat
fweefwee91 1 year ago
@MrBeatles4life I'm pretty sure there is a way to tell if you concentrate closely on the cover so I wouldn't tear it unless you see the other cover through the pasted one.
themusicalfreak13 1 year ago
@MrBeatles4life Dude I say go for it
FRE1991DDIE 1 year ago