Evolution Debate - djarm67 vs Dr Steve Kumar 2of2

djarm67, debates creationist Dr Steve Kumar in a live radio debate. "Dr" Kumar received his Ph.D in philosophical theology from the California Graduate School of Theology (an unaccredited organisation). He is the co-author of "Christianity for skeptics" along with fellow apologist John Heininger. Make sure that you watch both parts. You don't want to miss the end. In a live debate, you don't have the opportunity to take a timeout to research any points made by the other party. As such, if you find that I have made any errors, please feel free to respond in the comments or even with a video.

I hope you enjoy. I definitely did.

If you have not seen "Part 1" please watch that first.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N25XHfmqT-4

Category:

Education

Tags:

• evolution
• creation
• intelligent
• design
• debate
• Dr
• Steve
• Kumar
• owned
• pwnd
• john
• heininger

[scottclements78]

1:20 Yass open 24hrs, Yass is a town not a spelling fail.

[djarm67]

@scottclements78 The fail comes when you place the McDonalds "M" symbol in front of the town of "Yass". This is then compounded by "MYass" being open 24 hrs.

[scottclements78]

@djarm67 MY fail, lol.

[djarm67]

@scottclements78 lol

[djarm67]

@mhearstify The critique is directed at the techniques and misinformation of the creationist "Dr" Kumar. It is not a critique of Christianity. Please note that creationist views are not restricted to Christianity.

[stvabb]

Hilarious.! . It still surprises me that adults with access to a modern education will openly trot out this nonsense withoutembarassment (excepting the young-earth shyness - Ha-Ha-Ha .) I have to confess that there's a darkness within me that thoroughly enjoys the spectacle of a good imbecile taunting ,and "DOCTOR' > ? ¿ ?. . .was it St. Paul who had some spiel about being a man and putting aside childish thoughts? ( may be mis-quoting , haven't read that damned book in years).nicely done.+++

[JusticeIsWhere]

Great video..Thank you

[JusticeIsWhere]

Total bullshit, these types of disputes do not bring the theory of evolution as a whole into question. These disputes are to further define evolution theory. The apologist exploits conflict by misrepresenting the conflict to mean evolution theory is being disputed. Doctor of bullshit

[mylkTV]

That was excellent....well done

[MrHoolits]

Wow this is better than Cheech and Chong.

Hey is Dave home?

[TheDouchesupreme]

I'm open to the questions...I just can't answer any if it means I'm going to be made to look the fool.

Well played Kumar, well played.

[MalchikBlue]

This is embarrassing.

[changlinn]

You had the good "Doctor" on the backfoot the whole time. Well done.

[bignastydragon]

You got nowhere but it was entertaining. Mr kumar got owned.

[scarletharlot69]

@XGralgrathor true! problem is that many creationists agressively claim that 1. Special Creation is science and 2. that evolutionary biology is a religion. Complete rubbish of course.