DFU PRESENTS: Obama Tells Hillary to Leave the Race
Uploader Comments (dougfromupland)
All Comments (9)
-
With what I've notice in the world's growing antisemitism, I believe you're right, that Israel will have to strike first.
All-in-all thanks for speaking to me in the language of "logic"
-
I'm not really competent enough to discuss that subject of security measures. I am, however, greatly concerned about a nuclear weapon in the hands of people who don't care about their own demise. It may indeed be Israel who has to stop Iran's nuclear ambition. We will, of course, give them support as is necessary. I think Dr. Paul is wrong about the real interests we must protect around the world. We didn't cause 9-11. We are fighting an enemy who wanted us dead long before that.
-
I've seen in documentary vids the electronic/computer armed security measures the IDF employs to secure itself, it is as large if not larger (considering the size difference to the USA) as our own.
Do you think Israel is still at risk under Iran, or other hostel nations, and couldn't strike first if threatened, and remain safe?
-
I told him I absolutely appreciated his defense of the Constitution and ALL the amendments. I am worried about what Iran would do to Israel, not us. I take them for their word - they want to nuke Israel. Unfortunately, we would not have time to respond before the entire region would explode. Israel would retaliate with nukes. We have to be pre-emtive regarding Iran. They cannot be allowed to have a nuclear weapon. Unfortunately, Dr. Paul doesn't get it.
-
I'm aware of his, (isolation-esq?) policy.
I'll also admit I'm a one-track minded voter, gun-rights.
Would you say he doesn't care about N.Korea because he places his confidence in America's immediately available arsenal, that can reach half a world away?
-
I spoke to Ron Paul on a radio show the day before the Iowa Caucuses. I asked if N. Korea sent a shipment of nuclear missiles to Iran, would he either board and seize it or sink it. His answer was "Why would we do that?" That was not acceptable to me from someone who wants to be commander in chief. I know what Reagan would have done.
-
I don't want either Obama or Hillary in the White house, but choosing between the lesser of two evils... Yeah, Obama is a better choice.
But my vote is going to Dr.Ron Paul.
i vote obam cause we need change in this country
abizam 3 years ago
Obama is an empty suit and totally unqualified to be commander in chief.
dougfromupland 3 years ago
From Evita - "I love you and hope you love me." No, Hillary, we don't love you. Half the voters loathe you. A woman president is fine, just not you. I prefer one who doesn't hire thugs to intimidate witnesses, who doesn't lie to the grand jury, who doesn't use illegally obtained FBI files, who doesn't use the IRS to go after enemies, and who doesn't try to further harm the women assaulted by her sexual predator husband. Other than that, you're a real sweetheart.
dougfromupland 3 years ago