Beethoven String Quartet "Harp" 1st mvt.
Uploader Comments (Celloheaven)
All Comments (33)
-
The publisher always double-checked with the composer to make sure all notation was correct. so, I'm sure a repeat would not have escaped him. Nor would it have it escaped Mozart, Haydn, or any other composer who wrote anything in sonata-allegro form. The repeat is standard.
-
in this piece, beethoven "did" indicate a repeat. 1st editions may not be accurate but recent editions adhere more to beethoven's intentions especially the Henle-Urtext edition, where they based their sources from the manuscript and/or the composer's correction of the 1st edition. However, I myself don't do repeats. The important thing is the piece should be played wonderfully. Good job.
-
BRAVI! Congratulations from Germany
-
Amazing! I especially enjoy how they use no vibrato on those long chords- so inspired!
-
Next time try adding some drums or synth.
-
They are in school....jeez
-
wonderful players, great 2nd violinst!!!!!
-
Ensemble, intonation, sound, insight - this quartet has everything. Bravo!!!
Very good. My only beef is that Beethoven asked for a repeat of the exposition but its not here...if the master wants a repeat, it should be done.
tar23heel 4 years ago
I apologize for the absent of the repetition. But it was our intention to do non repeat as I have done some research about publishing music in the classical period. It was very subjective, in many cases, whether the repeat signs were written by the composer or the publisher...
You can find articles and researches about it on internet. :) Thank you for your comment!
Celloheaven 4 years ago