Atmospheric CO2
Uploader Comments (bernzeppi)
All Comments (25)
-
@fredrickdl Open letter to anyone new to all this.
If you want to know what this video is about, please look at the Encyclopedia Dramatica entry for Randomlaughingman aka Clara Massa. For Example “So the denier flies come a-swarming
Still dribberling the same old shit
Thermometers show the earth is warming
it's a fact their "facts" dudn't fit”
bernzeppi Aka Clara the rhymer
Not exactly intelligent discussion about climate change.
-
The climate models are not actually models you know they are spherical crystal devices that when the climatologists hands are laid on them a swirling mist reveals what will be happening in the future
-
In a scientific model all inputs of data must be looked at and no source of input can be overlooked. That is the basic fundamental of science. What heats the earth, what keeps the earth warm, what cools the earth, and so on. Earths climate is not a static model, for instance in Snow Mass, Colorado they recently unearthed Mastodons and Temperate Rainforest in an excavation and dated the remains 100K years froma climate much warmer than today's of manicured ski slopes. See above chart for CO2.
This graph is a representation of actual measurements.
However, have you seen one of these spherical devices in action?
You seem VERY knowledgeable.
bernzeppi 1 month ago
nice to see you spell arse properly.
Sad you have sunk to the level conspiracy theories.
Next it'll be HARRP
bernzeppi 1 month ago
Ah, yes a climate scientist was pain with nice shiny tax-payer dollars. Perhaps in the millions of dollars granted to perform. And for what purpose has there been to measure so precisely and accurately a stable atmospheric molecule? Well Anthropogenic Global Warming motivations of politically greedy people. Why else would a scientist spend months freezing their arse on a glacier melting ice core samples.
fredrickdl 1 month ago
@fredrickdl Yessss.... wonder what the motivation of studying the sex life of Drosophilidae...
Those anti-christians!
bernzeppi 1 month ago
this is merely a historical account of CO2 in the atmosphere... not a scientific model of the earth.
In case you don't know the difference.
How goes you Nobel prize?
bernzeppi 1 month ago
This is text book human patternicity, or want to associate patterns that seem to have a connection. This human trait leads to religion, superstition, and false positive connections. The fact of the chemistry is that CO2 is a weak GW-gas. A 30% increase is CO2 can no way accounting for our observed climate shift. Therefore the cause must be due to something else. CO2 can be increased by a factor of 10 and only a modest 2 degree Celsius rise in temps would be seen. Something else is is wrong
fredrickdl 1 month ago
@fredrickdl you just making those numbers up.
Standby... you are gonna get the Nobel prize by telling us what is wrong...
I wait with baited breath!
Booo to those thousands of pesky climate scientists.... Fred has the answer...
Lets hear it Fred...
The floor is yours
bernzeppi 1 month ago