Jehovahs Witnesses & John 1:1-God or a god?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
15,675
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 18, 2007

IN DEFENSE OF THE TRUTH: The Debate continues on John 1:1. Are Jehovahs Witnesses wrong in there translation of John 1:1? Is Jesus God or a god like the NWT reads? Lets see the Truth on this matter.

For more information please visit my blog site

http://witnesstogod.blogspot.com

Copyrighted Newagegamer3018 Ministry 2008

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 32 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (2,441)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • You cannot reference the Greek when discussing the bible. You MUST reference the Hebrew. The bible is a Hebrew book written by Hebrew people (not Jew-ish mind you).

    You must understand the word "God" in the Hebrew language + reference the prophets. There is absolutely NO WAY that Yahshua is the Most High. Get out of the so-called "New Testament" and read the Tanach and the Prophets.

  • After learning the real trinity not the modalist stuff that nontrinitarians are taught to combat the trinity I now believe John 1:1 arguments are stupid on both sides. Trinitarians you really want to argue that Jesus is never called something that the father is called(1 Samuel 2:3)? Don't you believe he's equal in every way? For nontrinitarians it's already revealed that both of them have the god title so the argument is moot on your end as well. I'm an associate of JW's whose leaving 1:1 argue/

  • Wooowwwww my brother i love you from all my deep heart you just sad it the real truth how should be exposed in the real sens of the truth wooww might Jehovah Agape you

  • We don't know who Jesus is really that is why there are all kinds of crazy talk among Arian Unitarians, Socinian Unitarians Functionalist Trinitarians Gradationist Trinitarians, Modalists-Sabellianists, Polytheists who all call themselves Christians. Everyone put down your Bibles and go out and have fun!!!!!!!

  • cont. Or perhaps he is the God-Man the second member of the Trinity who is the Father who became flesh in the Son see Athanasius? Or God the Son who is not the father but shares his same divine nature see Hypostatic Union/ Council of Chalcedon. Is Jesus Eternally functionally subordinate or is he Temporally subordinate in the Incarnation see Millard Erickson. John states that Jesus is G(g)od the only born G(g)od, the Messiah the Son of God. Jews claim that he is Yhwh. Thomas calls him Lord&God.

  • The Jews accuse him of making himself equal to God what did they mean by this? that he was claiming to be Yhwh's equal in power age and divinity? Or is the Messiah a Man not God or godlike. But Jesus says I AM Ego Eimi what does this mean that he is the Messiah or Yhwh himself in the Flesh who i also called "Ego Eimi" in the Septuagint Yhwh is called "Ego Eimi ho on" did Jesus say that he was "Ego Eimi ho on" in John? No. Is he another type of Ego Eimi as in the Messiah or Ego Eimi Yhwh?

  • cont. John claims that Jesus was pre-existent but as what? God the second hypostases of the Trinity who Incarnated as the Son sharing the Divine being with the father or Jesus the pre-existent being/person the only born son and therefore divine or godlike? Jesus never claims to be God the Father whom he calls the only true God the God who is his father who is greater than himself. Yet Thomas calls him my Lord and my God we get all kinds of mixed messages from John Jesus and Thomas! cont...

  • cont. Or the word (Yhwh's plan) was, and the word (Yhwh's plan) was with Yhwh and the word was Yhwh. Or the word was Michael the Archangel and Michael was with Yhwh God and Michael the Archangel was a god. Or the word/wisdom was with The God and the word/wisdom was divine. Or what God was the Word was. How are we to know what Scripture means in John 1:1 when we can derive all kinds of meanings fro this verse alone. John doesn't help because to him Jesus was "Logos theos" "Monogenes theos" cont.

  • John 1:1 reads "In eternity the second person of the Trinity Jesus was, and Jesus was with God the Father the first person of Trinity and Jesus was God just like the Father or Jesus was God the Father. Or in the beginning of all creative acts the Word was, and the Word was with The God(Yhwh) and the Word was a hypostases of (Yhwh) or "divine like the Father" or "a god" (a second god) or the Word was with the Elohim (the Celestial Deity) and Word was Elohim(Celestial Deity).

  • @imajesusfreak91 Jesus is the christ(Anointed one)..He ain't God..he's the son of God..idiot!!!..Read John 20:17...1 corinthians 11:3...Luke 4:8...Psalms 110:1...Psalms 83:18...John 17:3...Daniel 7:12,13,14

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more