Howard Roark VS 9/11 truther kooks @ Toronto Hearings pt.1

Burnt out hippie proudly displays his 9/11 truth button, calls Roark 'pervert'.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Howard Roark takes time off from designing the Enright House to confront 9/11 deniers outside of Ryerson University, Toronto during the so-called 'International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001'

Filmed Sept 10, 2011

Category:

Comedy

Tags:

• truther
• twoother
• twoothtard
• confrontation
• Sept 11 hearings
• hearing sept 11
• 9/11 hearings
• toronto hearings
• torontohearings
• 9/11
• September 11
• 911
• kooks
• nutjobs
• building 7
• WTC
• thermite
• false flag
• Alex Jones
• Northwoods
• September 11 attacks
• World Trade Center
• One World Trade Center
• twin
• tower
• towers
• debunker
• debunking
• debunked
• 9/11 debunked
• 9/11 myths
• Inside job
• outside job
• infowars

[stratocaster539]

@longhairsRcool Ok read.Firstly this is not a peer-reviewed or experimental document - so we shall treat it as scientific opinion.My daughter (a structural engineer) says that generally the maths is fine if a little speculative at times.She points out however that there is too much reliance on generalisation and is purely hypothetical,and lacks a collapse mechanism.Steel can lose 60% of it's elasticity at around 780C and still support over 3 times it's structural loading.

[longhairsRcool]

@stratocaster539 PART 2: Read the paper. I can show lies by Alex Jones, his evidence as is loose change's evidence is lies and exaggerated truths. I highly doubt you're going to take time to read the paper full of math and look at the opposing side. I used to be like you blaming the government for everything and the NWO. It's an easy way out. Then I stopped being a loser and looked at logic. I would suggest you do the same. It's hard to admit you were duped but I guarantee it's worth it.

[longhairsRcool]

@stratocaster539 I do have a peer review paper on exactly the speed and reason the towers fell. You can read the paper yourself. You can read the paper. The main point is the beams were weakened coupled with the kinetic energy against the structure by large PLANES caused the towers to fall at the center of gravity where the plane hit.

crono911.net/docs/Bazant2007.p­df

The paper is in the link above. Peer reviewed by The Department Of Northwestern Energy and Civil Engineering.

[stratocaster539]

@longhairsRcool Just where do you think you get off telling me what to say and think? Do you have a peer-reviewed scientific paper to back up that mental diarrhoea you just excreted?1000F is only 587C - THAT'S LESS THAN THE 600C THAT I JUST STATED! Boy, what a moron, you can't even do a simple temp conversion! Just about every steel appliance that uses naked flames exceeds this without any damage from the heat.Only a twat like you would buy the official lie.Peer-review or STFU.

[longhairsRcool]

@stratocaster539 Only you little wiener truthers say melt. You need to get this melt shit out of you little melted brain. When jet fuel is burned where it's trapped it creates intense heat up and over a 1000 degrees F. This WEAKENED the steel beams and in combination with the immense weakening of the structure by a heavy jumbo jet traveling hundreds of miles per hour caused the tower to collapse. This "melted" bull shit isn't even part of the official story your just following Alex Jones.

[stratocaster539]

Sad very sad. Hard working America tax payers have to pay welfare to mark robert's trolls so that they can go around harassing decent people and preaching their pseudo-science.He is obviously upset about something, you can tell by the way he is acting.He needs to settle down and start acting rationally.Kerosene would only reach about 600 deg c not 1800 deg c - even NIST's attempts to melt steel with controlled flame failed.

[loosechangeexposed]

@barksdale69 i will watch when i have time.

i do know that truthers lie and hide info to make themselves look good, my video "sept 11th the smoking gun" exposes them in a cover up. my video "how the towers fell" explains how planted explosives would be impossible and the planes are what caused the towers to collapse.

[barksdale69]

@loosechangeexposed Keep researching loose. You will see it eventually. Its like one of those computer generated pictures you stare at that doesnt have an image on it and the longer you look at it and focus on it you begin to see an image. It will show itself to you eventually. Trust me, I used to be just like you and believed everything I was fed. Peace! Oh, and, watch 911taboo.

[loosechangeexposed]

@loosechangeexposed cont from prev post

where was that guy when the 2nd plane hit? if he was inside he would not have seen the plane and he would have been hearing other peoples accounts who were also inside, people would have been saying things like "the upper floors exploded"

if the planes were fake how did they do it when more people say they saw a plane than didn't and if they faked the planes at the wtc why didn't they fake 1 at the pentagon? did they forget to?