(check for the sounds, sometimes it just gets louder)
I introduce here Azrienoch's acceptism, i explain the role of acceptions in the formation of beliefs, and I enhance the distinction between acceptions and truth.
I then attempt to give a definiton of the absurd based on acceptism, I explain my concept of "transitive acceptions" that would be the only possibility to access the world, and I arrive at the conclusion that apathy is the best way to truth from a totally different path than common absurdism.
I called it "Proto-axiomatic acceptism", I thought that using words like "epistemology" or "knowledge" would be too wague in regard of the possibility of denying both of them with acceptism.
Hey you should make this video a response to one of his videos
underdog3 3 years ago
You are so right, how come I had not thought about it?
I will do right now. Thanks!
maksiiiskam2 3 years ago
Very nice interpretation of Az's book.
randyhelzerman 4 years ago
thanks, I realise (now I've uploaded it obviously), that there are many things I did not cover. I thought that 9 videos was way too much when I looked at your playlist and now I realise I could make more than that. First impressions are mistaking, there is lot of substance in this book.
maksiiiskam2 4 years ago