McDonald v. Chicago: An Exclusive Heritage Foundation Interview

Following the Supreme Court's decision in McDonald v. Chicago, the Heritage interviewed the lead attorney Alan Gura, the plaintiff Otis McDonald and Second Amendment Foundation President Alan Gottlieb about the ramifications this case will have for the Second Amendment throughout the country.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• second amendment
• heritage
• heritage foundation
• 2nd amendment
• guns
• gun rights
• alan gura
• alan gottlieb
• otis mcdonald
• handgun ban
• mcdonald v. chicago

[RightWingTV]

The bigger news is the 5-4 decision. Do we really have 4 Supreme Court Justices who believe Chicago's gun ban law is Constitutional ? Wow ! It is amazing how we, as Americans, stay so calm, collected, and reserved, when a handful of politcal hacks at the Supreme Court can decide if we keep or lose our liberties and freedoms.

[penguinistas]

Thank you Mr McDonald for standing up to the Chicago political machine to take back your rights. Mayors banning guns from the insulated safety of their walled mansions really don't care about the little people they pretend to serve.

[hockeyslade]

@treid100182 why would you say such a foolish thing?

[treid100182]

I hope Chicago wins.

[jhunted7667]

years ago in Connecticut your pistol permit said that ( the person named has a legal right to carry pistols and revolcers in this state , they took that off that off the permit now they say that it is a privilege I asked

[mallardhead]

@Cstrife234

It may as well be full of us as it is not collecting a lot of other comments and here is where we will attract even more folk... Can you imagine Martin Luther King Jr. in a Schlitz Malt Liquor commercial eating chitlins? Or imagine Hector P Garcia, who set up LULAC, in a Mexican beer commercial, eating tacos? Blacks and Hispanics would be enraged!

[mallardhead]

@jhunted7667

Joseph Kennedy made most of his money running booze in Prohibition, too! Was it for the principle of freedom or the chance to get money that both men bucked the law? Kennedy wanted to buy his way into the blue blood society! What about Hancock?.. And, no, I did not reject God, just the Church. When the dust settled He was there ready to get to the real work of Truth!

[jhunted7667]

@mallardhead well John Handcock , the biggest signature on the Declaration of Independence was a whiskey smuggler if that helps you , but as for the Church you can turn your back on it because alot of churches are corrupt  just don't turn your back on God , he brought me back from the dead , you may need his help sometime

[jhunted7667]

@Cstrife234 the freemasons here were inflitatred in 1778 by illuminati bankers

where do you think the money came from to build Washington DC , the money was given with the understanding that the bankers should have a say in the layout of the city ,b the founding fathers at that time had no Idea what was going on the Banker was French the French helped us win the war , who knew

[jhunted7667]

read Connecticut laws , it used to be that you had to be a fellon to be denied a gun NOW connecticut law states that if you protest and the police arrest you ,you resist even verbally you are a rioter and with a misdemeanor charge they can take your guns they have added alot of unconstitutional laws I think that someone should look into it with money willing to fight

[VinnyS914]

@penguinistas It's called HYPOCRISY. We have an asshiole in my jurisdiction that is so anti gun it's disgusting. There's a video of the piece of shit firing an MP5 (which is reserved only for law enforcement in many jurisdictions) I thought guns were all bad, liberal fuck.

[VinnyS914]

Does anyone notice what I do? Gun opponants NEVER ask legislators to pass harsh laws against criminals or elevate mandatory minimum sentences for criminals that use guns. They ONLY target legal gun owners.