UNFCCC Executive Secretary responds to The Davos Question

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,579
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 23, 2008

UNFCCC Executive Secretary, Yvo de Boer, responds to 'The Davos Question' posed to the public and the participants of the 2008 annual meeting of the World Economic Forum.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (12)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • UN idea, made by the Bilderberger cult, to brainwash people to think that more taxes and governmental control of climate is a good thing and saving Earth. Someday we will be facing a breathing tax. Doomsday prophet politics from the elite is the wrong path. Alternative energy is a good idea and should be top listed in regards to this topic.

  • Oil will deplete sometimes, it's not so bad to invest in renewable energy sources.

  • there is something more sinister then we want to believe going on

  • FRAUD!!!

  • Note GISP ice core temperature shows 1 degree C higher 1000 yrs ago, 2 degree C higher 2000 yrs ago and 3 degree C higher 3300 yrs ago with many ups and downs in between. Note the polar bears are still here and the earth did not flood. Oh the Vostok ice core from Antarctic shows the SH experiences the same thing drastic temp change is the norm, get use to it.

  • I think it is important to understand their proof of man made global warming. There is no direct proof an increase of 100 ppm in CO2 has any effect on temp. Fact is an increase of 100 ppm CO2 has a no effect on temperature in the lab, none! You need to increase CO2 to about 200,000 ppm in the lab to see a 3 degree C change. Global warming nuts then say, well the lab is not fair because CO2 is 50,000 feet of atmosphere.

  • So there are some theories based on an idea of layers in 50,000 feet that tries to prove a 100ppm increase in CO2 increase temp a few tenths of one degree F. A few degrees F is an insignificant increase much less proof of man made global warming so the nuts say well CO2 has an amplifying effect and then they rely on flawed global warming models which are grossly positive lookback biased so of course they are going to show an amplifying effect from a small amount of CO2 as they are built to do

  • We are seeing the beginning of the end of current man made global warming craze in just the same way we seen the early 1980s global cooling craze end. What ends it is the temperature goes in the other direction and the models are proved wrong.

    When I was a kid it was all about global cooling and a certain ice age that the models all showed was coming. But this ended when the temperature started to rise and we found out the models did not even include the ocean current data.

  • Since 1998 the temperature has been cooling and today we are in a low of sun spots and oceans temperatures are at a low as well. Expect this cooling trend to continue for several years killing the current man made global warming craze. And proving the models wrong again. These leaked emails are just the beginning of the end, again. .

  • Please watch and support my DAVOS QUESTION.

    It desperately needs exposure for a chance at getting featured at Davos. Thank you!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more