"We've All Bought Into The LIBERALS vs CONSERVATIVES Theater!" Jon Stewart Interview pt.1
Top Comments
All Comments (341)
-
@dandemon1989 facisti chi mi
-
@GladiatorShield shut up, fascist.
-
shocking the lesbian and Jew have critiscm againist the republican party
-
@chronDiggity The e-mail he got TELLS HIM that the Jon Stewart show isn't interested in conservative pundits. You have your evidence in black and white of Jon Stewart's partisanship - alongside his hypocritical arguments against partisanship.
Want to ignore it? Blow it off? Fair enough. I wouldn't expect more from a Jon Stewart fanatic.
See ya, kid. Good riddance.
-
OMG That shit is HILARIOUS. Dude's just crying because he wasn't invited on the show.
The idea that the proof that Daily Show has a liberal agenda because they didn't invite one of the biggest douche bags on youtube onto their show is quite simply the purest unadulterated mental diarrhea I've seen you spew here.
You have failed demonstrably. I asked for proof Jon Stewart underplayed the Weiner scandal, and you link me to a cry baby conservative. LMFAO!
You had your chance, bye
-
@chronDiggity watch?v=HdW4geJ-lik
-
prove it.
-
@chronDiggity Or I've answered you (such as, reminding you that Stewart tried to underplay Weiner's scandal rather than run with it) and you have nothing rational to respond with. So you're taking your ball and going home.
Fine with me. I did what I could for ya. My conscience is clear.
-
@chronDiggity In regards Weiner, I remember how Jon Stewart was in regards teh story when it first came out. He was the most softball of them all - which, considering his supposed "comedic" theme, is rather odd. If Weiner were a Republican he would have been out of the gate on him from the very beginning. Then, even after Stewart started to cover the story, he tried to put a complimentary spin on it. He criticised the media, and was mostly upset that a Democrat seat was lost to Republicans.
-
You're blatantly ignoring my points and not answering very simple questions.
Have the last word. I'm not reading it. I'm done with this circular logic.
Poor Rachel. She looks so genuinely puzzled at the age-old concept of objective journalistic integrity.
toddmlbauer 1 year ago 51
The real difference is that Fox News lies continuously to bolster their viewpoint.
Rachel, on the other hand, uses facts to support her arguments. If there are any mistakes, she quickly makes acknowledges it.
TheSnoopy1750 3 months ago 5