Top Comments
All Comments (11)
-
@drunkalfuzzyness it work but I doubt they will man-rate it now that ESA had acquire Soyuz(see their youtube channel), it safer to use a proven design for manned flight I guess...
-
@ramster0 Agree waste of funds---a vehicle that u can reuse makes sense but to let it reenter the atmosphere and burn up! Note the US Shuttle was built on at least 1/2 of its acutal budget---inflation cut NASA's budget of Shuttle development and never got those loss inflated money back! We are really really stupid in the US with that JACKASS PRESIDENT we have and the present NASA Admin---we are giving up on working and living beyond the Earth. Good Luck Nations Nations of Europe, u win!
-
@ramster0 You mean 'waste'.
-
I met to say Waist, not wast
-
WOW! what a wast of money
-
then you live in the 16th biggest house in the world
-
holy crap thirty feet! how insane thats like a fraction of my house!
-
kind of a good idea. but um... ya build the thing so it can last afew days? then let it burn? lol. good idea needs to be abit cheaper lol. basicly a flying Market good for a few weeks lol.
did it work in the end??
i reely hope so!
drunkalfuzzyness 3 years ago 4
impressive!
fabtabulous 3 years ago 3