Atari XL/XE - Mr. Do! [Datasoft] 1984
Uploader Comments (StaxX28)
Top Comments
-
Much better graphics and sound than any other home version!
-
I stand corrected.
The SNES version was much better.
All Comments (34)
-
Looks and plays like "Digger".
-
@dreamcastII Digital press needs to get a clue. The Snes was not capable of emulating the hardware mr. do ran on. It's not just a matter of bits the cpu can take at one time. Generally speaking you need a cpu running about 10 x the hardware you are emulating. Even if you could get just the cpu emulated it would run too slow to play. That's not even counting the sound hardware. Yes, you could use samples but, they would be muffled from compression. So no, it was not emulated.
-
@gameguy73 read the review from digital press online - this is a cut and paste "Somehow, for some reason, even today, we still get emulations of 8-bit games on higher capacity machines with slow-down. And, although this emulation was programmed about ten years ago, we are still talking about a 16-bit machine running an 8-bit game. There probably is a reason for it, but I just don’t want to accept it. Slow-down is noticeable ..."
-
The SNES version was NOT emulated in any shape or form.
-
It looks slower than a real Atari 8 bit...
-
0:39 OH SHI-
-
actually I had privilage to play this game on Amstrad CPC 6128. Atari verion is much worse and I tell you that as atari 65XE user
-
SNES is emulated from arcade, so take that into account and is 10 years later ...
ROFL!!! Classic 8-bit
BEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEP
crash! xD
RedHeadRadulf83 1 year ago
@RedHeadRadulf83
No, it's a reset ! ;)
StaxX28 1 year ago