Richard Dawkins: A Deeply Religious Nonbeliever
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (39)
-
@Cryotropical Then how can you delude yourself and believe that hydrogen and oxygen, electrons and protons, should first produce themselves, then be the source for all other beings, and finally decree the laws that regulate themselves and the rest of the material world?
-
Gotta Love DAWKINS, the man
-
@1tabligh you dickhead, you've just said man is completely unable to comprehend god, so what the fuck are you yammering unknowable rubbish for?
-
I know Einstein wasn't religious, but so what if he was?
Einstein may have been very smart for a human, but humans aren't infallible. If Einstein HAD believed in a god, I'd simply have considered him wrong about that, even if he made great contributions to physics.
Arguments from authority may have traction with the fundies, but not with me.
I mean, take Newton. Newton believed in Alchemy. Take the US founders, they believed in Slavery. Intelligent people can be dead wrong.
Dawkins FTW
flip5426 3 years ago 31
What is wonderful and so overlooked by this clip is that Dawkins clearly states that an Einsteinian view of theology is not problematic which means that there is still room for theological and philosophical research. His problem is with religion and the concept of a personal deity, not naturalistic spirituality.
WitchyWayWoman 2 years ago 20