Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Is Canada's Gold Corp. Good for Guatemala?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,630
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
There is no Interactive Transcript.

Uploaded by on Nov 14, 2011

Lyuba Zarsky: 85% of gold revenues leave the country, where majority live in poverty

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • This is an example where people have zero representation in their own country.

    Normally if a company wanted a resource like that they would have to make a continuing deal with the local people there (not the far removed government). If the people there were happy and continued to be, the company could stay, if they were not, they would have the ability (backed up by the gov) to kick them out.

    Even if there was pollution downstream others would be able to sue.

    This is corrupt government.

  • Same old capitalist story.

see all

All Comments (24)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @mikecorbeil Although I wouldn't argue that any Canadian, even abroad should face prosecution for accused crimes abroad, the Charter of Rights and freedoms is being ignored on a far more important level currently.

    I would be more concerned with incidents like protests at the G20 and the C10 bill. As bad as any corp may be, if you can't even protest it, nothing is going to change.

  • @ExquisiteDoom 15% of total revenues from the Marlin Mine might be a lot of money in our minds, but given the huge amount of money Gold Corp. makes from this mine, 15% is surely far too little.

  • And the UN also a critical or crucial responsibility that it's NEGLECTING, or blatantly, tho silently, refusing to apply; just as the Cdn govt is doing. There's the critically important international or UN Human Rights Charter that's hardly ever applied or respected by the UN, due to the UNSC always ending up countering UNGA votes.

  • @sirellyn wrote : "Normally if a company wanted a resource like that they would have to make a continuing deal with the local people there (not the far removed government)."

    I think GC would need to deal fairly with both the local population as well as the govt of the country, and that would especially be true if that govt is to back up the locals. Since all working Guatemalans earning enough income to pay inc. taxes, all of these Guatemalans need to be fairly dealt with as well.

  • @fallenempireoverdrve if they're competent enough to do so, what good are they if they (resources) sit idle because some governement says no? Protect the country , but screw the rest of the world? I think it's a little more complicated than that.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more