The 1st Council of Nicea 325 A.D., Part 5 - Dr. Ray Hagins

In this exciting informative lecture, Pastor Ray Hagins does what very few Pastors would dare to do. He methodically takes you step by step through the circumstances that led to the need for this meeting to take place and explains how the concept of Jesus the Christ was created in 325 A.D. The First Council of Nicaea, held in Nicaea in Bithynia (In present -- day Turkey), convened by the Roman Emperor Constantine I in 325, was the first ecumenical (1) conference of bishops of the Christian Church, and most significantly resulted in the first uniform Christian doctrine, called the Nicene Creed. With the creation of the creed, a precedent was established for subsequent "general (ecumenical) councils of Bishop's (Synods) to create statements of belief and canons of doctrinal orthodoxy -- the intent being to define unity of beliefs for the whole of Christendom.

This is the council that created the concept of Jesus the Christ and it was patterned after Heru (Horus) from the Ancient Kemetic (Egyptian) mythology. Ausar (Osiris), Auset (Isis) and Heru (Horus) were the first holy trinity and Joseph, Mary and Joseph was patterned after this. The mythology of Ausar, Auset and Heru goes back about 10,000 years. There is a history why you have not heard of them. The history behind the creation of Jesus the Christ has been hidden from most Christians on purpose because it was created by the Roman Catholic Church. They have never wanted the truth to get out.

Learn why the Council of Nicaea occurred and the results of the Council such as the creation of Christmas from the ancient festivals of Saturnalia and the celebration of the birth of Mithra (the Persian Sun god).

I know all of this information sounds new to you, but the council of Nicaea was the 1st of 21 Ecumenical Councils that occurred between 325 A.D and 1870 A.D. there is a reason you have not heard of them. These councils were held by the Roman Catholic Church and shaped Christianity as we know it today. I strongly suggest you read "The Worlds Sixteen Crucified Saviors" by Kersey Graves and "Christianity Before Christ" by John G. Jackson for more concrete information on this subject.

You can purchase this DVD as well as many others at www.AfricanHistoryNetwork.com. Be sure and listen this 24 hour Internet Radio Station, www.WBLR.com.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• African
• History
• Black
• Egypt
• Kemet
• Ray
• Hagins
• Christianity
• Nicea
• Jesus
• Bible
• Constantine
• Ecumenical

[sirromby1]

If what he is saying is a lie,prove him wrong.And please don't use JAMES STUART VERSION.I'am sure you did'nt know your so called king james had a last name.You can't prove he's a lie with a "LIE".HOTEP!!!

[mraaron81]

why can't people handle the truth, the bible is a lie jesus is a myth, stolen from the story of horus,kristhna,budda, and many others...it's sad that we are afraid to open our eyes

[HoodstarMoTg007]

@mraaron81

and muslims are they false ?

[wahnano]

I like this man. Thank you brother Man.

[madcult1941]

777

[veritaslogos]

think about what you're saying. "it may have been refuted time and time again" which would mean that the proposition has been shown to false, therefore it would either entail that it was defeated on historical grounds, or that a recount of history was not even necessary because it was faulty on some other count. either way, if the proposition is defeated, no other kind of argument is needed.

[mjrob1914]

Thanks Redman4853 for your comment. Why don't you call into his show on Sunday Night and ask him? I think you are referring to the picture of Serapis Christus who was Ptolemy I. Do some research on him. What type of research have you done on the Council of Nicaea?

[mjrob1914]

Thanks Redman4853 for your comment.  Why don't you call into Dr. Hagins program on Sunday or Wednesday night and ask him?

[mjrob1914]

Thanks BrothaErv, what are you referring to in REVELations 13:16?

[mjrob1914]

Veritaslogos, thanks for your comment. What are you referring to?

[mjrob1914]

Vertaslogos, thanks for your comment. What is historically inaccurate with what Dr. Hagins is saying. It may have been refuted time and time again but what has been historically invalidated?

[veritaslogos]

this is such an old and hopeless argument. It's been thoroughly refuted time and time again and hardly ANY professional academic opponents of Christianity use it for just such reasons