Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Mitt Romney answers question on carbon cap

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
1,842
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 31, 2007

Talks about energy independence, more drilling, conservation, and an international agreement

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (15)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • There are two ways to conquer a nation. One is by the sword. The other is by DEBT. John Adams 2nd pres of US. We are under siege. Educate yourself on history or we will repeat it. 2012 is the end of an error. Restore America Ron Paul is a man with real integriy, not the same man with a different name. We can do better and we must do better or the USA will be a historic country, not a leader.

  • he's pandering to his blueblood upper crust moronic buddies.

    another fraud was 'the ozone hole'. had nothing to do with cfc's.

    He's a flipflopping politician. Get ready for carbon tax, higher prices. Biodiesel and cellulose are experimental and MORE expensive.

  • Cap and Trade....one of the things that all elitist politicians agree with.  More taxes, less energy, etc.

  • @stater68

    He's right in line with McCain and Obama.

  • Global Warming is fraud you dumbass. The government should not invest in anything.

  • He is right, he mostly wants to invest in alternative fuels so the US can become energy independent, and it's a good thing that he mentions that global warming might not be real.

  • A Mormon won't do Business in the WHITE HOUSE. An Experienced (Business AND Government), Educated, Intelligent, Fiscally Responsible, Man of Strong Morals and Character will be in the White House. MITT IS THAT MAN.

  • Hear! Hear! Mitt '08!

  • No regrets policies?

    Biofuels don't reduce CO2...

    Liquified Coal... Twice the CO2

    ANWR? Nah

    Even in the most optimistic scenarios we couldn't even reduce 1 barrel of oil as compared to oil demand increasing.

    Not just us? Why? We're making up 25% of the problem, and all of the historical problems.

    By demanding that it's "global" it's merely commiting to doing nothing.

  • Romney fans,

    GOOGLE this: UltiMitt

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more