Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Conservapedia

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,060
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 12, 2009

A message about a biased/hilarious website
Conservapedia.com

  • likes, 6 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Uncyclopedia is a more "trustworthy" encyclopedia than conservapedia.

  • The military is expensive. How would they pay for it with low taxes?

see all

All Comments (40)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 1:1 describes me pretty well (apart from the bestiality) and I'm an atheist. Great to see we have all the fun!

  • what really pisses me off, is per capita atheist and agnostic in the united states give significantly less to charity than theist. bill gates and waren buffet the riches two people in the world, donate to charity, more then all the Christians put together. and all the christian charities take a large percent as income.

  • I was immediatly convinced by the beginning tune.

  • Well, they are right in regards to the dropping of certain mores when one finally accepts that one is an atheist. But, they didn't say why these mores are actually useful, or of benefit, at all. So, yeah, we did drop some silly religion based morality, in favour of a more rational, universal morality. Yes, I have no prob with gays, smoking of weed, sex, porn (as long as it's not misogynistic, or pedophiliac)or any of the other god-based mores. Because they're not rational restrictions.

  • the first time i visited conservapedia, i was expecting some bullshit, but they have really outdone themselves on there.

    it is sad that there really is millions of morons here in the US that just gobble that shit up too.

  • I will say, of their list of "immoral behaviors" that atheists and agnostics were likely to find acceptable, I only consider drinking and drug use as wrong when they negatively affect your life, and I'd need a definition of "obscene sexual behavior" to even judge that. So spot on, Conservapedia! Now, explain why those things are supposedly "immoral" to you?

  • @CraniumOnEmpty They're serious. Seriously stupid.

  • That's right Conservapedia, push against science, we'll see how that works out for you.

    Laws of Nature explanation > everything else

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more