Conservapedia
Top Comments
All Comments (40)
-
1:1 describes me pretty well (apart from the bestiality) and I'm an atheist. Great to see we have all the fun!
-
what really pisses me off, is per capita atheist and agnostic in the united states give significantly less to charity than theist. bill gates and waren buffet the riches two people in the world, donate to charity, more then all the Christians put together. and all the christian charities take a large percent as income.
-
I was immediatly convinced by the beginning tune.
-
Well, they are right in regards to the dropping of certain mores when one finally accepts that one is an atheist. But, they didn't say why these mores are actually useful, or of benefit, at all. So, yeah, we did drop some silly religion based morality, in favour of a more rational, universal morality. Yes, I have no prob with gays, smoking of weed, sex, porn (as long as it's not misogynistic, or pedophiliac)or any of the other god-based mores. Because they're not rational restrictions.
-
the first time i visited conservapedia, i was expecting some bullshit, but they have really outdone themselves on there.
it is sad that there really is millions of morons here in the US that just gobble that shit up too.
-
I will say, of their list of "immoral behaviors" that atheists and agnostics were likely to find acceptable, I only consider drinking and drug use as wrong when they negatively affect your life, and I'd need a definition of "obscene sexual behavior" to even judge that. So spot on, Conservapedia! Now, explain why those things are supposedly "immoral" to you?
-
@CraniumOnEmpty They're serious. Seriously stupid.
-
That's right Conservapedia, push against science, we'll see how that works out for you.
Laws of Nature explanation > everything else
Uncyclopedia is a more "trustworthy" encyclopedia than conservapedia.
videoguy604 10 months ago 11
The military is expensive. How would they pay for it with low taxes?
RadarKat73080 1 year ago 4