Spitfire, the legend, the facts and its opponent (4 of 5)&fmt=18
Uploader Comments (Olfux)
Top Comments
-
"Iain. Did your Dad know a flyer called Keith Park? He worked in Malta too"
Dont try and tell us he was a yank too!!
You go on other RAF films and abuse them making statements like it was the yanks who were the few and that you won the battle of britain!
then come on here and ask about Sir Keith Park as if you know him!!!
your mad mate!!
Video Responses
All Comments (41)
-
at 04:22, what is this man on about? has he ever heard of the Hellcat or the Corsair?
-
thanks for these. Its nice to see a comparison video. As an englishman I have a lot of respect for the 109 and the fw 190. The 109 was more reclined in the seating position which meant you could handle higher G turns. lol if germany and uk had fought as allies the world wouldnt have stood a chance I think. Both fantastic enginering countrys
-
It is incorrect to say that the Americans didn't have a fighter that was worth anything until the Merlin was put into the Mustang. The P-38 Lightning was a very capable fighter. It was only marginally less maneuverable than the BF-109 yet it was faster. It had the benefit of contra rotating engines which eliminated torque problems. was well armed and had the best roll rate of any fighter in the European theater after the addition of hydraulicly assisted ailerons.
-
Some years ago there were many Hurricans and Spits doing gate duty at the entrances to RAF bases up and down the country. Most, if not all, were replaced with replicas and the original aircraft taken into storage and eventual restoration. I am glad they did this rather than leave them to rot out in the open.
Restored airworthy Spitfires are worth between one and three MILLION pounds.
-
The Spitfire shown with 5 bladed prop is not a MK IX ! IX had merlin engine with props turning opposite way ,this one is Griffon engined probably MK 16 ? Also nose cowling is longer and "chunkier"
-
@blert88 Well my grandfather seems to think that there are only three in service but I said that was imposible because we have at least two double seat spitfires in flying condition which would mean we only have one single seat spit. That is also impossible because of the memorial flights.
The key point is that there is restoration done by certain people and most of the ones that were in museums were restored to flying condition and the museums now have dummy spitfires!
-
@ceboym this has nothing to do with planes...it was to do with pilots and as you said yourself there was not that many... I am not knocking the overall help the yanks gave!!
-
@paddy6062 Lad in some degree the yanks were right that they also won the Battle of Britain Why? because the production-manufacturing whatever of Spitfire was speed up due to American help they have modern machine tools that help a lots in manufacturing the the spitfire thereby enabling the british to replace the lost aircrafts,the yanks dont mean in terms or air battle everybody knew there were only few US pilots that contributed in the Battle of Britain DONT QUARREL FOR THIS YOU WERE ALLIES
The plane at 02:36 is not a spitfire mk.IX but a mk.XIV (see griffon engine bulges)
SmiertSpionem 3 years ago 4
. . . . and take a look at the five-bladed propeller too.
Olfux 3 years ago
According to this only three Spits were retained by the RAF after the aircraft was retired, but I think I'm right in saying that the RAF nowadays have twelve in flying condition which are part of the Battle of Britiain memorial flight.
blert88 3 years ago
You are absolutely right. Many Spitfires of all marks are now restored to flying condition around the World - I think there's at least 50-60.
Olfux 3 years ago