Wedding Photographer, Ryan Brenizer: How'd They Do That?

Adorama Photography TV presents "How'd They Do That?" featuring wedding photographer and visual storyteller, Ryan Brenizer. In this episode of "How'd They Do That" Mark talks to Ryan Brenizer in Central Park about Ryan's photography style and his unique "Brenizer method". Enjoy learning about Scott's technique and how he creates his special "Brenizer method" images.

Find out more about Ryan Brenizer here:
http://www.ryanbrenizer.com/

Post your "Brenizer Technique" photos on the AdoramaTV Flickr group: http://flickr.com/groups/adoramatv

For related articles and videos, and to order books and other products to help you create great wedding photos, go here: http://www.adorama.com/alc/article/Wedding-Photographer-Ryan-Brenizer-AdoramaTV

Visit http://www.adorama.com/learn for more photography videos!

Send your questions to: AskMark@Adorama.com

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Adorama
• Adorama TV
• Mark Wallace
• snapfactory
• snapfactory studios
• Ryan Brenizer
• weddings
• brenizer method
• central park
• Photography
• Digital
• Digital Photography
• Camera
• photojournalism
• engagement
• lifestyle
• Interview
• Ceremony
• Events
• Wedding

[fedeboca1]

the couple under the umbrella in the rain, that photo just blew my mind.

i hope someday i'm able to shoot anything like that

[MrNullifier]

@garym5 What an ignorant comment. You totally missed the point. There is no way you can get shallow depth of field with a wide angle lens. Not unless you are right in the subjects face (and then you get extreme deformation). It's not about the wide angle but the depth of field.

[CampFireFilmsInc]

I actually do stubby and very good at it.

[subbyGDT]

@CampFireFilmsInc I hope you don't do this for a living.

[Astro1645]

I'd love to tell you what I though of this video but I need to keep it a secret.

[BloatedSensations]

@Nogert The subject,(Speaking here of the person being the subject) doesn't appear in every one of the shots. Depending on how many shots you take, the subject only appears in 1, 2, or maybe 3 of the shots. The rest of the shots are of the surrounding area to the subject. And, yes, a moving subject can be a danger that will mess up the shot. You need to tell your subject to remain as still as possible. And, that's why he says he "wants to shoot the parts that move first."

[Nogert]

@BloatedSensations wouldn't this technique make more sense to shoot with a 50mm prime at 1.4f and then Create a panoramic with that.

[Nogert]

I don't understand if the image is basically being overlapped for the purpose of creating a shallow depth of field why does he move the camera position after every shot? surely you could just fire off about 15 stationary pictures right?

Also surely after about 10 shots the subject has moved slightly and ruins it.

[LRSS2455]

What I find funny is, I did the same thing when I first starting photography. Just goofing around, playing with my 50 1.4 & PhotoShop. I was just wanting to test out the panorama function in photoshop. I thought it was cool. I showed some people and they "corrected" me on photography. Now I know, I'm just gonna do what I like and I'm not going to care so much what other people think.

[mackidd51]

I follow him so long in 500px there and I did not know its him until 1:46 that photo