Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

1911 Feed Test

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
5,340
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 30, 2011

Showing that my 1911 can feed empty casings.

You may be wondering what the significance of this test is or what it proves. Basically it just shows that the 1911 is capable of feeding ammunition with the BIGGEST possible hollow point cavity for the specified caliber -while the "bullet" is way under the specified OAL-.

Looks pretty reliable to me. :)

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (miGsKills)

  • What's better a Glock or 1911?

  • @222buckley

    You are opening a can of worms right there buddy. haha

    They're both great handguns and better is a subjective term. It depends on the user, what they want, what they need and how they use it.

    Glocks are usually good to go right out of the box. Trigger is a bit "squishy" but good when you get used to it.

    1911s need a good break in period and tuning. Once that's done, it should run like a top and have that great glass rod single action trigger.

  • Go ask the large training schools what their records show on reliability with students choice of a handgun when they go through the training. Rob Pincus recently said on the Armed American Radio that 1911's had a 92% failure rate during his week long intensive training class as a platform. This is why Rob carries a Glock. The 1911 is a great gun which I carried in the ARMY but the modern handguns are better designs for reliable performance. Defensive handguns don't need 1" groups.

  • @ProxStud

    Glocks are great handguns, I have nothing against them.

    Not all 1911s are reliable out of the box, but they can be made just as reliable with a little tuning and good magazines.

  • what brand? Colt? Smith and Wesson? Colt? Kimber?

    if you see this please reply

  • @xiXGreyXix

    Metroarms.

see all

All Comments (20)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Alexn1067 I understand the logic behind the empty case test. Although, as I said my 1911a1 will feed empty cases all day long with a modified magazine follower. But, reliability becomes an issue with the actual bullets with a modified mag. (they are short and have no projectile to help guide it into the chamber) Yes, I agree. But the bullet can make a slanted contact with the feed ramp or the top section of throat preventing feed.

  • @KresTKroVee if it feeds empty cases without fail, it will feed wad cutters. I don't know why you'd use such ammo anyhow. My point, empty cases are extremely light and in no way aid in feeding (they are short and have no projectile to help guide it into the chamber.

  • @Alexn1067 OK, my 1911 will feed empty cases all day long if I modify my magazine. Been there done that for testing reasons. Now, can you promise me that my 1911 will not jam on some flat-nose wad-cutter bullet castings in normal magazines?

  • @KresTKroVee dude if it will feed empty cases, it will feed live rounds...enough said

  • @miGsKills The only problem with the test is there is no bullet touching the feed ramp. The casings simply slide under the ejector and are fed forward in a controlled feed. Reliability becomes an issue most of the time due to bullet contact with the feed ramp.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more