The Masculinist on Male Circumcision

This video is me taking a stand for my fellow MAN. We are being sexually assaulted, mutilated, and victimized as children. We are held down against our will as BABIES and have our most intimate body part cut off of us! The foreskin has four times the nerve endings and sensitivity as a clitoris, and has Langerhann Cells which fight infection. We are Americas youngest citizens born FREE in this country with First Amendment Right to decide our OWN religion and that Right is STRIPPED from us when people cut us up in respect of THEIR religion. Most do it thinking it has health benefits--Im a nurse--I can tell you just like the American Nurses and American Pediatric Associations will tell you...there is NO medical need for this "elective" surgery that we babies have to go through. --Luciano Da Vinci, Author of soon-to-be-published novel The Masculinist: A Knight Without Armor In A Savage Land

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• The
• Masculinist
• on
• male
• circumcision
• equal
• treatment
• human
• rights
• violation
• child
• abuse
• sexual
• assault
• of
• minor
• knight
• without
• armor
• in
• savage
• land
• foreskin
• langerhanns
• cells
• nurse
• first
• amendment
• right
• freedom
• religion
• body
• mutilation
• san
• francisco
• diego
• mgmbill
• ban
• intactivist
• sf
• california
• discrimination
• victimization
• elective
• surgery
• medical
• jason
• luciano
• romero
• da
• vinci

[EdgyBroEDGY]

How about this, let the parents decide because really the parents decide everything for a majority of the child's childhood. If you disagree with it don't let it down. But I'd give it to the parents because at birth the baby has no value therefor cannot value its foreskin.

[TheMasculinist]

@EdgyBroEDGY How about this...let the person who is actually HAVING the surgery done decide for THEMSELVES what body parts are important to them. Medically, its called "Informed Consent" and its LEGALLY REQUIRED that EVERY patient be able to give it before surgery. Those children undergoing the surgery CANNOT voice consent and therefore should NOT be FORCED to have body parts removed WITHOUT consent. Thats what I like to call...THE LAW.

[CynDaVaz]

Actually - after forcible retraction (i.e. before it's ready to be pulled back), the guy often *isn't* okay. Permanent damage can occur, which can also lead to future issues (infection, etc.) This is why many of the supposed 'foreskin problems' happen in America - doctors ignorantly advise parents to retract the child's foreskin (or parents just take it upon themselves, thinking that's what they're supposed to do).

[TheMasculinist]

@CynDaVaz Accurate. Many people foolishly pull back the foreskin before the age of five, which can cause bleeding and pain for the child. People are stupid. It doesnt take a lot to HEAR the words...JUST DONT TOUCH IT...but people want to do their own thing, and that includes cutting babies up just so their lazy asses dont have to deal with NOT touching it. "Leave your babies intact" --Dr. Spock

[kotfrank]

HERE'S THE QUESTION: Is it okay to cut off part of someone's body without their permission without medical need? YES or NO!

Latest study showing circumcision harm:

Int J Epidemiol. 2011 Jun 14. [Epub ahead of print]

Male circumcision and sexual function in men and women: a survey-based, cross-sectional study in Denmark.

Of course no one says it better than the KNMG, see this also at CircmcisionAndfHIV

[TheMasculinist]

@hudna1 Galatians 5:6 Circumcised or uncircumcised makes no difference in the eyes of the Lord. They are actually LESS cleaner, because the foreskin helps FIGHT infection, and more attractive...lets talk about that...MOST people find a man who can get an erection in his older years WITHOUT viagra MORE attractive. and the foreskin is MORE sensitive than a clitoris and the chief area of AROUSAL and where a man achieves erection.

[EdgyBroEDGY]

@bajhendo If you wanna take it out of context but I see what you mean. I think it is more fair for a child to choose, but honestly you don't have much of a choice the first 18 years of your life when it comes to your medical health and such. No one is asked a lot of things, but it happens anyways.

[bajhendo]

@EdgyBroEDGY By that reasoning though, parents should have the right to decide to amputate their child's arms for no medical reason.

[EdgyBroEDGY]

@TheMasculinist I'm for that too don't get me wrong. But it's not like the child had much of a choice being born anyways but I see what your saying.

[RoseFink]

Excellent, well said! Yes forced circumcision is child abuse. Thank you for speaking out.

[jeremiahlouf]

This is extremely interesting to me, having known nothing about this so far, and with the thought of having children at some point in my life.

Is there anywhere I could find the written version of this essay, or would you mind emailing me a copy?

I don't use youtube as a platform of communication so I won't check for messages. If you wouldn't mind, please shoot me an email. Thank you jeremiah.louf@gmail.com

[ben9345]

@TheMasculinist Wow. I am from the UK and am not circumcised. I was so confused when I found out how many people are circumcised in the US. Being an atheist I may be biased in that I don't respect unlimited freedom of religion but I must say I agree with everything you say and I think its great that someone especially an American who is vocalising this.

[Mccudden25]

@TheMasculinist - You have no understanding of ANYTHING I have said, good day.