Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

No-Planers are a total waste of time

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,691
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 8, 2009

www.911disinformation.com

This is a collection of pictures showing Flight 93, which was shot down in a field over Pennsylvannia. Please get and read David Ray Griffin's "Debunking 9/11 Debunking" and keep a copy of the book handy when you are online arguing with shills.

Ever single Debunking Argument the Government has ever come up with can be disproven with facts.

Don't let them obscure the facts any more than they have already tried!

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (WarCrime911)

  • I dont get it. So are you saying terrorist really hijacked planes then? haha if the government did this they wouldnt need to shoot down a plane that was hijacked.

  • @Mr420woo,

    ROFLmao! You totally exposes the inept logic of debunkers! Who was the fighter pilot who intercepted Flight 93? Was he the "entire government"??? Was the entire government inside of the cockpit of that figheter jet with him? Were they sittinng in that cockpit and acting on the controls of that aircraft?

    The Air Force Pilot who shot down Flight 93, was acting AGAINST Dick Cheney's Stand Down order.... He protected his country, AGAINST his orders!

  • @Mr420woo,

    You totally exposes the inept logic of debunkers! Who was the fighter pilot who intercepted Flight 93? Was he the "entire government"??? Was the entire government inside of the cockpit of that figheter jet with him? Were they sittinng in that cockpit and acting on the controls of that aircraft?

    The Air Force Pilot who shot down Flight 93, was acting AGAINST Dick Cheney's Stand Down order.... He protected his country, AGAINST his orders!

  • @Mr420woo, It was remote control planes. The "No-Plane" theories are just there to make us look stupid and crazy...

    Dov Zakheim was a member of PNAC who designed AWACS CTS Flight navigation and control systems for the DOD through his company Systems Planning Corp.

    If you google "Flight 77 Passenger List" you will find a dozen or so names of people with Top Secret clearances who allegedly died on that flight who were involved in Remote Control Aircraft technologies and/or Pentagon $Finance$

Top Comments

  • Are you talking about the same thing as this video? I see some small airplane parts, no bodies. Didn't the coroner say he has never seen one drop of blood from that plane?

  • is this a joke?

    show me the two engines or shut up

Video Responses

This video is a response to 9/11 Suspects - Dov Zakheim
see all

All Comments (102)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @WarCrime911 Oh, and I didn't mean you. I understand what you're saying. I mean what ever moron that believes this garbage.

  • Hey Moron, a little bit of smoke and a few burned trees is not your typical crash site. They usually leave mile long scars and tons of debris, not a hole in the ground the USGS recorded in pictures in the 80's nor a quarter of a waste container of debris. Do you know how large these planes are???

    Where's the luggage??? You can find hundreds of photos of well documented air crashes of passengers jets this large and the devastation they leave behind is at least 100 times of what you show here.

  • I can't believe there is a WarCrime911 video that I don't like.

    The video not only doesn't deal the the evidence of planes being at the WTC but instead is 6-minutes of images taken from the supposed crash site of F93.

    Being that this video is oooold and one of the first I'd like to hear thoughts on this site after the years of research on the matter.

  • Not one bit of photographic proof at all here ! I think I have WarCrimes911 all

    figured out ...lol I think I smell shill

  • This video is a total waste of time. Some good comments though. I have resently startet looking at this No Plane theory and the TV news does look very strange. Like the WTC7 building reported to be collapsed before it did. So who know. Why some truthers is so relutant to speak about the fake tv news and the chance of missiles hitting the towers instead of planes does make me think.

  • Can anyone say corodite? LOL Anyone military on here can tell u that! FYI, did anyone here know that the crater and 'wing scars' already existed 20 years ago :)

    Go look it up and see pictures from 1996 of that SAME CRATER AND WING SCARS.

    Not much of a conspiracy, just use your eyes and not your retarded version of 'patriotism'.

  • @WarCrime911 It was remote controlled planes? And the no-planers are trying to make You look stupid? I think you're doing a pretty good of that yourself. So you think there are lists floating around of people with top secret clearance against which we can validate the passenger manifests? Hey, if they had top secret clearance, don't you think they might have known that the flight was going to crash?

  • The 9/11 Commission NOW reveals that the official version of 9/11 was based on false testimony and documents and is almost entirely untrue. The sources and details of this massive cover-up are carefully outlined in a book by John Farmer, who was the Senior Counsel for the 9/11 Commission.

    Farmer, Dean of Rutger Universities' School of Law and former Attorney General of New Jersey, was responsible for drafting the original flawed 9/11 report.

  • @Tarn

    DID YOU KNOW? Out of the 6 supposed hijackers, who weren’t found alive in other countries. 4 of them were given their Visas by top US Gov Officials. There is an interview with Michael Springman - 'Chief of Visa Selection at US General Consulate in Jeddah 87-89' who gave the "terrorists" their visas. He admits how they did not meet standard protocol, but the US gov pushed them through anyways to get the terrorists in to the US for air training. His Interview @ watch?v=F9-IISF4ckg (at 4:30)

  • FBI Admits No Evidence on Bin Laden

    On Jun 5-2006 author Ed Haas contacted the Federal Bureau of Investigation headquarters to ask why, while claiming that bin Laden is wanted for multiple events, but not 9/11!

    Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI responded, The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Osama bin Ladens Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11. Tomb continued, Bin Laden has not been formally charged in connection to 9/11

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more