A War of Words leads to nowhere Iran approach

Ron Paul's Position on Iran is dam right! The discussion by Fareed Zakaria shows that Obama position as well the Position of Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum are very questionable and not helpful to the US foreign policy!

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Ron Paul
• Iran
• Fareed Zakaria
• GPS

[guitarwiz420]

Ron Paul 2012

[McGriff99]

Bret Stephens works for the Wall Street Journal and was the editor of the Jerusalem Post. As a result, it should be no surprise that he disregards the view of previous Mossad directors on military intervention in Iran. Pure propagandists. Period.

[thebaskkid]

5:55, this woman is right.

[McGriff99]

@MagicKirin

Riiiiiiiight. I see facts arent your strong suit. And who are the Iraninas? Is that a mexican thing?

[rants2004]

Mr Stephens, is more than welcome to go fuck himself. Warmonger piece of shit! How much does he get paid by the apartheid state of Israel to spew unadulterated excrement?

Zionist cunt.

[MagicKirin]

@McGriff99

Of course the IAEA under that terrorist lover El Bareerdi gave cover tho the Iraninas

[MagicKirin]

Fareed you an islamic apologist you see no danger in the intolerance as exhbited by regimes in Iran and others.

Hey if you thinks its so benign how come Turkey only damaged relations with Israel under an ignorant islamist PM?

[McGriff99]

@tippingpts

Is there another situation in recent world history thats similar to this? Yes, India and Pakistan. After the Indians secured a nuclear weapon, Pakistan was hellbent on getting one as well, to deter India from invading Pakistan and reclaiming territories lost during Partition. Most foreign policy analyst believe the next nuclear weapon will be detonated in India or Pakistan, but these countries have survived nuclear oblivion through increasing detente.

[McGriff99]

@tippingpts

If Iran does produce a nuclear weapon, what then?

Its logical for them to want one, if only to act as a deterrent to Western interference in their domestic affairs, which has been occurring in some form or another since the 1950s (that we know about). Are they a match for Israel? Certainly not, in terms of both the nuclear arsenal they might produce AND the weapons technology needed to deliver a bomb successfully. Israel would wipe Iran off the map not the other way around.

[McGriff99]

@tippingpts

Conclusion (thank god):

There is really no direct evidence (at least none that can be fairly and openly scrutinized by everyone) that Iran is enriching uranium for weaponization, besides the fact that they continue to enrich uranium to higher grades. Personally, I believe its highly unlikely that they have not considered nuclear weapons production at some point since the 1970s but are probably using most of that uranium for civilian purposes.

[McGriff99]

@tippingpts

(E) Several concerns (from outside of Iran) have been raised about the authenticity of the alleged studies documents, including the possibility of forgery. This concern is especially relevant given the recent history of faulty intelligence supplied by the U.S. (and informants working with U.S.), specifically the lack of WMD in Iraq 2001-2003 (and lets not forget the Gulf of Tonkin). The U.S. has refused repeated requests to supply the documents for international scrutiny.