Illustra Trailer

For more information about Illustra Media, please visit Illustra's newly redesigned website at http://illustramedia.com.

Use Coupon Code YTIM15 to save an additional 15% Off Sale Prices!

For more information about the individual films please visit:
http://unlockingthemysteryoflife.com
http://theprivilegedplanet.com
http://thecaseforacreator.com

Category:

Science & Technology

[Skurvy2k]

@diogok "the more science advances, the more we have evidence for a creator..."

Explain this if you would please.

[addmoreice]

@diogok um...what evidence is that? there is none. here let me break down the ENTIRE argument made by people who don't understand science.

I don't understand how that could happen naturally! therefore god!

argument from ignorance, sorry no thanks.

[1tabligh]

@AuxentiusZ Such a statement is highly *absurd* that order and rectitude should come about *without* a Creator, and disorder and impropriety of design and *fate* should suppose a Creator. He is an *ignoramus* who says this, because anything produced *without* design will ***never*** be exact and proportioned, while disorder and contrariness cannot co-exist with orderly design. God is far above what the *deluded and duped ignorant atheists* say.

[1tabligh]

@AuxentiusZ I disagree vehemently with intelligent design

___

Absurdity of Atheism!

If abiogenesis spontaneous creation *without* specific "design" can be admitted under such conditions of regularity, then purposeful generation and definitely balanced creation can be the result of *error* ad perplexity, since these two are *opposed* to abiogenesis.

[AuxentiusZ]

I disagree vehemently with intelligent design, but I do believe that evolution occurs the way it does because the laws of physics demand it. There is no contingency if everything is determined by natural law from start to finish. That being the case, life was bound to come about, advance, and perhaps one day learn to control the laws of physics that brought them about. The question is not if there is a God in the past, but whether we shall become God in the future.

[gloin10]

@SaraDavido21 You are possibly 10 years old? You are entitled to your belief, no matter how absurd. However the childish "I DONT CARE WHAT ANYONE ...blah blah" is not very convincing to anyone over maybe 14. You have definitely not convinced me with this juvenile squeal. Oh yes, most of us who do use our brains tend to find the faith-based view of life plain silly, where it is not downright evil. Go check out the historical treatment of women in the main monotheisms, why don't you?

[gloin10]

"What is our relationship to reality as a whole?" Mr Phillip Johnson asks. In his case, tangential or marginal, based on faith not facts. In fact his relationship to reality is unreal and fact-free.

@kkkaldav wrote "Since ID is obviously scientific". No it bloody isn't.  There is no convincing evidence of any "irreducibly complex system", so please stop lying. Produce any, and it will be looked at, but grandstanding is not evidence.

[AndrewTheEternal]

@IllustraMedia

I can tell when I'm not fucking wanted.

[5tonyvvvv]

@Skurvy2k If the Moronic atheist studied Homochirality and Racemic mixtues, they would know life could never arise by chance!!!

[5tonyvvvv]

@kkkaldav If the Moronic atheist studied Homochirality and Racemic mixtues, they would know life could never arise by chance!!!

[LesPaul2006]

And I think creationists should spend more time actually PROVING intelligent design than pathetically attempting to disprove evolution.

[LesPaul2006]

The very worst that could happen to Darwin's evolutionary theory is what happened to Newton's gravity theory; that someone comes down and completes it (if it was to be incomplete). But even if evolution was completely disproved tomorrow, to replace it with the "god did it" argument is childish and stupid.