Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

CDI Beirut Hilton hotel implosion

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
175,066
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 18, 2006

Controlled Demolition, Inc.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • because whenever someone sees a video of a building collapsing they always start an argument on 9/11. It's just another fact about YouTubes dumbass members.

  • When will they stick explosives into Paris Hilton, then?

see all

All Comments (148)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @koolbossjock you are trying to claim WTC was CD by stating molten metal on a video of a CD??? If molten metal is any indication of CD then where is it in this video??? There is none because controlled demo does not result in molten metal. You fail to logically explain the relevance of your statement. Just like a typical truther someone told you something and with no thought to what it means you blindly repeat it lke the dumb fucking sheep that you are.

    Truthers are fucking idiots.

  • @Nesiroo

    Yeah, they should stop talking so much about the fall of the berlin wall.

  •  you have to be extremely fucking stupid to not see the facts.

    And YOU are fcking stupid and ignorant.MOLTEN steel cannot be achieved by burning Jet fuel.Oh but scientist and demolition engineers are fcking stupid anyways.I bet you go to a pet store to get parts for your car.

  • @AdamBomb669 Well there is no reason to suspect that the demolition of the WTC buildings was conventional; in fact the presence of the nanothermite attests to its highly unusual nature. Nanothermite is more of an incindiary than an explosive (although it could be used for either purpose). So there is a reason that it was quite: nanothermite was used and thermite doesn't go "BOOOOOOM" it goes "boom."

  • @AdamBomb669 and a couple explosions, which could have been, I don't know, fucking pockets of oxygen exploding from contact with fire, or maybe portions of the inside of the building breaking down and collapsing. But there is absolutely zero evidence that it was any kind of an intended demolition and you have to be extremely fucking stupid to not see the facts. And not the conspiritard facts that you idiots made up. The real fucking facts. Shut the fuck up and suck Alex Jones cock.

  • @152czar Let me ask you 152 something. Where were the repeated explosions that are seen and heard in every controlled demolition? And I don't mean the few flare ups you saw when the building was already coming down or one or two rumblings that sounded like bombs. I mean a clear visible and audible repeated boom boom boom boom boom boom boom for 20 or more seconds before it came down? Oh that's right there were none. You can point out a couple rooms in the towers that lit up as it came down.

  • @152czar and you need an education you moron.

  • @12weasel100 You need to google scholar search: ACTIVE THERMITIC MATERIALS.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more