Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

High Water Mark (Partial) - Iced Earth Live 2008

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
10,645
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 5, 2008

I caught about 6 minutes or so of this song. My battery tanked...and trust me, I'm far more pissed about that than you are. Still, it's a Godly song...It may not be full, but I'm betting you're still gonna find it awesome.

Category:

Music

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (FritzIsMetal)

  • OH my God !! What happened to Matt ? He just completely screwed the vocals on that one !! I have seen both Ripper and Matt live, and I can tell you for sure Ripper's voice was perfect on that one. Even though I don't like Ripper version Of Dracula, he's one of the best singers nowadays and some songs he did with Iced Earth are better than with Matt (The Clouding, Ten thousand strong, or gthe entire glorious Burden album)

  • Sinus infections (if that's what it was) really f***s your voice...

    he did perfectly fine in the intro, though. And I don't agree with you on ALL the songs that were re-recorder with Matt...The Studio versions of "Setian Massacre" and "The Clouding" with Matt are definitely awesome...but I personally don't want Schaffer to waste time and money Re-Recording shit though...not interested...its been done. Just move forward and give us new IE Material.

Top Comments

  • I want to hear Barlow re-do the Glorious burden. That'd be interesting.

  • Agreed, i like Matt alot but Gettysburg triology should only be sang by Tim

see all

All Comments (53)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • perfect song - fucked vocals

  • Shaffer had barlow's backup vocal tracks already for Glorious Burden, so it actually features both singers voice. maybe thats another reason why its so good.

  • @hinson5150 definitely not more powerful at all. Ripper has a great range and the song was composed with that range in mind. Barlow has a much more intense kind of sound. Yes, he can't quite hit those highs like Owens, but Owens can't hit the lows Barlow can either. I think that Ripper is a great singer, but glorious burden was about it for that dude. But, again, I find Barlows vocals far more powerful.

  • @hinson5150 Agree 100%

  • Nobody should sing the Gettysburgh trilogy except Tim. Nobody

  • Ripper's voice is just more powerful than Barlow's. I like Ripper better.

  • @zeratul78 On the album? You are kidding right? A studio is a controlled enviroment. Its completely asinine to compare a live performance with a studio album one.

  • awesome vocal performance, barlow, schaffer..

  • in "background"

  • lol ppl in talking about song

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more