Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

SEPTEMBER CLUES G

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
32,984
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 9, 2008

The SEPTEMBER CLUES website: http://www.septemberclues.info

The SEPTEMBER CLUES forum: http://www.cluesforum.info

On 9/11, the US TV networks used computer generated sceneries of Manhattan. Multiple techniques of image manipulation were employed to simulate "airplanes crashing into the World Trade Center". We now have conclusive evidence that the TV networks were proactively complicit in staging this false-flag operation needed to gather public consensus to wage immensely profitable, illegal wars.

The forensic analysis of the live images leave no room for doubt : they do not depict authentic imagery nor real airplane crashes but turn out to be entirely doctored video sequences which effectively fooled the worldwide TV audience. Thus, the live broadcasts now stored in the major TV networks' archives, constitute the most solid, verifiable and repeatable proof to expose the falseness of the official version of the 9/11 tragedy.

The subsequently released, so-called "amateur" videos were more sophisticated video composites yet all have now been exposed for what they are : total forgeries. Most likely, electromagnetic technology (commonly used in war zones (to jam electronic circuitries) prevented any private footage being recorded at the time of the tower strikes. Scores of testimonies confirm that cellphones or firefighters' walkie-talkies did not function properly in NYC that day.

Most on-the-scene witnesses reported a SMALL aircraft of some sort : Arguably, what they saw was a winged missile. The 4 purported hijacked flights, as well as the related passenger lists, turn out to have several problems as far as their authenticity is concerned : a long list of documentation (or lack of it) reveal serious discrepancies regarding NTSB, BTS and FAA data. All of the above facts, taken together, suggest that none of the official descriptions of the events are credible.

  • likes, 14 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (simonshack)

  • what i dont understand is:alot of people filmed the second crash, so we should have video material where u cant see a plane but a missile!!so why we have no amateur footage of a missile???

  • @eLEphandy

    The technology to selectively jam any given electronic circuitries is routinely used in military operations:

    tinyurl . com / VISUALCONTROL (remove all spaces)

  • Is this your film Simon? If it is, it is very impressive.

  • @eotto2001 Yes it is. Thanks for your kind comment - for more info and updates, please check out

    my website: septemberclues . info

    the discussion forum: cluesforum . info

  • At 07:35 in the lower left part of the screen the building starts moving before the camera does! And then moves at a ridiculous speed.

  • @joroma77 Hehe - well, that is in fact supposed to be a moving truck... This doesn't mean the video is real though.... :;-)

Top Comments

  • this isn't relevent to anything but...you have cool music

  • @theshow2k8

    Just do a YTsearch for "SEPTEMBER CLUES F" 

see all

All Comments (155)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Fosax Most likely nobody was actually killed. It's a simple matter to create fake identities with backgrounds and say all of them died in some towers. There were reports of a fire drill in the towers that morning and workers were denied entry. Watch "9/11 Actors" and ask yourself if those "relatives of victims" are authentic or not. 9/11 was a hoax top to bottom. The only real thing that happened that day was that the buildings were demolished. The media took care of the rest.

  • at 05:23 it too looks like nose-out from a building done by moved camera?..better seems like nose of missile or what is it?..this is tough:)

  • @simonshack So..Are you still alive?

  • And WHY exactly would the US government plot something this majestic that would kill so many people?

    And the "black" mask edge was actually the results of a bad quality image.

  • I believe that it was planned by the government, and I really enjoyed watching your films. But, I had a question. I know there are a lot of evidence for us to believe that it was planned by the government and the films were fake, but are there any “evidence” that the authorities are using to make us believe that it was actually a terrorist attack?

  • i can hear a game saying " taken the lead " a few times starting at about 6:40 ????

  • get over it! the planes were never hijacked!

  • i'm not doubting that your videos are genuine proof. they are very interesting and you have clearly gone in depth of evidence showing that no planes hit the buildings, but what about the people who happened to be there and claiming that they saw planes, too? if cameras and computers made the whole world believe that the Twin Towers were hit by planes, surely the innocent have nothing to hide and would step up and say there were no planes on that day because i was standing near the towers?

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more