Whoops, a Living Index Fossil!

Searching for Evolutionists Who will Defend Their Position (DEBATE DODGERS)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Re6d-EvKkbA

Fossil with Original Shell Millions of Years Old - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coaatMdZokE

Fingerprints of Creation video destroys the dating methods used by evolutionists. http://www.nwcreation.net/videos/fingerprints_of_creation.html

The results of Dr. Robert V. Gentry's investigations have been published in leading scientific journals; Science, Nature, Geophysical Research Letters, Earth And Planetary Science Letters, Physical Review Letters, and Annual Review Of Nuclear Letters and are subject to peer review by evolutionary scientists.

The Fossil Record: Intermediate Links - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IPe7744MpOE

"Most of the species of maidenhair are extinct; indeed they served as index fossils for their strata until one was found alive." "The youngest fossil coelacanth is about sixty million years old. Since one was rediscovered off Madagascar, they are no longer claimed as 'index fossils'—fossils which tell you that all other fossils in that layer are the same ripe old age."—Michael Pitman, Adam and Evolution (1984), pp. 186, 198.

...I fully agree with your comments on the lack of direct illustrations of evolutionary transitions in my book. If I knew of any, fossil or living, I would certainly have included them...Yet Gould and the American Museum people are hard to contradict when they say there are no transitional fossils...I will lay it on the line - there is not one such fossil for which one could make a watertight argument. Personal letter from Dr. Colin Patterson, Senior Paleontologist at the British Museum of Natural History in London, to L. Sunderland

...the gradual change of fossil species has never been part of the evidence for evolution...Darwin showed that the record was useless for testing between evolution and special creation because it has great gaps in it. The same argument still applies...In any case, no real evolutionist, whether gradualist or punctuations, uses the fossil record as evidence in favor of the theory of evolution as opposed to special creation. Mark Ridley, New Scientist, 90:930, 1981

Quotes by Evolutionary Scientists Against Evolution - http://www.warneveryone.com/evolution_scientists_quotes.htm

Live broadcasting with instant message - http://www.justin.tv/warneveryone

KJV1611 Bible - http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=authorizedversion&search=Search

The Institute for Creation Research equips believers with evidences of the Bible's accuracy and authority through scientific research, educational programs, and media presentations, all conducted within a thoroughly biblical framework.
info@icr.org
http://www.icr.org

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• crxxxev
• coelacanth
• fossil
• evolution
• index-fossil
• maidenhair
• Devonian
• Paleozoic
• Mesozoic

[gregrutz]

@BereanBeacon1 The DNA Tree of life also matches Darwin's tree of life. More proof of evolution.

[gregrutz]

Sharks are still alive too and no one even notices?!?

[gregrutz]

@clawedification 98% of the species that ever lived on the earth are extinct. There are no dinosaures, no trilobites, no Cambrian Marine Creatures, no sabertooth tigers, etc. Evolution does not say thing have to change, most of them did.

[clawedification]

@charadester Shameful? Really you dare to impose that you are right and there is no way to refute evolution? The problem with evolution is that I do understand it and it is a common sense killer. Stop thinking in the box and get to the realization that you dont know how but we are.The fossils are very clear to us, we see hundreds of animals and thousands of insects that have not changed in millions of years.Genetic mutation that increased the info. in the genome?

[BereanBeacon1]

@charadester "evolutionary science" is an oxymoron and not real science. The "tree" is invented and you wouldn't dare bring that up in a public debate. Unlike you people we allow both sides of real science to be presented and discussed. The problem is for your side is the lack of real science so your only option is to brain wash students and not allow them to question it.

[charadester]

@CamW30 I agree, but the story of our descent from other life forms removes them from the exclusive pedestal they want for humanity over all other species. All we can do is spotlight their deceptive practices in the hope that some people will start to dig a little deeper and see the real evolutionary story. Thanks for your comment.

[charadester]

Absolute misinformation. A terribly deceptive business and a deliberate distortion of evolutionary science and the knowledge on which our culture is based. Shame on the creationists. The coelocanth is an offshoot at best in a very bushy evolutionary tree showing the kinship between the lobe-finned fishes and the earliest land-based amphibians. Makers of these videos have no interest in truth, only a desire to impose their false ideology on unsuspecting people. A shameful business, indeed.

[CamW30]

@haz020190 - These guys really don't understand evolutionary theory. I wish that I could get a job at ICR; it would be much easier than having to think for a living.

Do they not realize that evolutionary theory is so much more beautiful, more fascinating and more awe-inspiring than any "godunnit" explanation that they can come up with? It is so sad that they miss out on how extremely magnificent nature really is. What a bland life they lead.

[haz020190]

ceolocanth is along the path that fish would have taken in evolution to amphibians. unfortunately not very far advanced and still very close to its ray finned fish predecessors.

when the news of its discovery arrived scientists hoped it would have been the missing link. and something very similar in the past would have been, although more likely a fresh water species.

still frickin cool though, you know they give birth to live young!

[gregrutz]

@nscastaneda We are correcting the lies. This was never an Index fossil. They thought it was extinct but it wasn't, so what?