friendofdarwin responds to NarcolepticFrog *REPOSTED*
Uploader Comments (friendofdarwin)
All Comments (36)
-
ah, ok I understand now :)
-
nah you dont understand , i was talking about narcoleptic frog having the hate...you just basically repeated what i said but more spelled out...thank you
-
u need to respect other to get respect? well, I agree with that BUT: 1) respect someone doesn't equal respect his/her beliefs automatically. 2) You have the right of free speech but no one has the right of never being ofended. 3) did you watch the first minute of the video? it seems to me that this NarcolepticFrog is doing the same. 4) and Evolution is not a matter of "belief", despite a lot to be find out yet there's enough evidence that points in that direction, get over it
peace
-
i dont believe in the hole evelution thing but i do believe believe in evoling because even if there was a God what kind of cruel god would there be if he created beings that could not change in a world that changes. and i do believe in god and things can evolve i do believe in both. also why all the hate NarcolepticFrog? seriously, does anyone call u names like that when they dont believe the same as u? u need to respect others to get respect!
-
"So, if I were to sit down with an atheist and begin asking where things came from, they would run out of explanations."
Are you trying to tell me that creationists have all of the answers? That simply saying "god did it." works?
Like I said, your conclusions are some of the worst I have seen online.
What you are saying is this:
"If you or I cannot explain it, then a god must have done it."
No need to disprove a god, the supernatural is not addressed scientifically.
What caused your god?
-
I'm inclined to believe that things were created. There's no absolute that can disprove this argument. I can't disprove evolution either, but attacking and belittling my arguments is as meaningless because you can't disprove either argument.
-
So, if I were to sit down with an atheist and begin asking where things came from, they would run out of explanations.
Example:
Certain elements make up an atom. So where do those elements come from? Where do the elements that made those elements come from? There is one absolute: these elements come from something. Either they were created intelligently, or were a consequence of existing elements. Both happen in nature. So I guess the question remains, "what caused everything to be?"
(cont)
-
Bud decided to send me a message:
BudCrispman has sent you a message on YouTube:
atheism I agree with you on the evolutionary point. When put in that context, I think your right. I don't have a problem with evolution, because it's evidenced in nature all of the time, though many evolutionist thinker are also atheist. Atheism is not so convincing. everything we observe in nature was created or was a consequence of some "thing" that already existed.
(cont)
-
Not sure why the double post was necessary.
-
See, that is wht I mean...that is your opinion, not a fact. Stating your opinion as fact is the worst type of opinion/conclusion.
As for a rebuttal...I made my statement, not rebuttal was required.
As far as the atom, I have no idea scientifically...do you?
And let us leave magic and the supernatural out of this.
You know I was and am a fan of this one. It's a pleasure to give it 5 AGAIN and fav AGAIN. :D
philhellenes 4 years ago
Haha, thanks Phil, I was thinking about you when I dragged this one out of the attic!
friendofdarwin 4 years ago