@Dominator5515 I can't find the information you detail on that website. Anyways, go to this website: h ttp : / / w w w . rt66 . c o m / ~korteng / smallarms / sabremig . htm [remove spaces] and read it including the top image. It is from a US perspective and at the bottom it shows the controversy over the actual number of kills by either side. Also, none of this information incorporates MiG-15s shooting down other types of US planes, or MiG-15s that should have won but were flown by North Korea
@princekahir they fought the japs and americans too
DJonX7 2 months ago
@CODking3636 Lol, they're not ugly. they're classics.
DJonX7 2 months ago
@deadcauz how the hell would you know? Those planes back then were highly advanced for it's time. So who cares how good they look
CODking3636 2 months ago
0:19 Lockheed P-80
darkalemanbr 3 months ago
man does planes where ugly as fuck
deadcauz 3 months ago
@Hperman09 The first fighter escorts were WW2 style planes. Easily destroyed with a jet fighter.
GishabrunLOB 3 months ago
@GishabrunLOB What about the fighter ecort to the B-29s?
Hperman09 3 months ago
The chinese communist pigs had to invade the korean peninsula.
Gwegqwet 4 months ago
@Dominator5515 I can't find the information you detail on that website. Anyways, go to this website: h ttp : / / w w w . rt66 . c o m / ~korteng / smallarms / sabremig . htm [remove spaces] and read it including the top image. It is from a US perspective and at the bottom it shows the controversy over the actual number of kills by either side. Also, none of this information incorporates MiG-15s shooting down other types of US planes, or MiG-15s that should have won but were flown by North Korea
GishabrunLOB 4 months ago
@GishabrunLOB
Acig.org says 5 to 1 ration in a favor of Sabre , it's reliable source .
Dominator5515 4 months ago