Real ALIEN Skull DNA Proof: Randy Clark May 2011
Uploader Comments (goforitrandy)
Top Comments
-
@kurreproduction1 Because when you look at a sample of 30,000 base pairs you find that a chimpanzee is only 3% different from humans, a gorilla is only 5% different, a mouse is only 30% different BUT this alien is 50% different from humans. That means it is nothing like humans. There are no exact physical matches to humans on this skull. It can only be extraterrestrial from somewhere else not earth. There is NO genetic match to anything on earth. Pure Alien no human.
-
It sounds to me like hydrocephalus or something of that sort. If you look up images you'll find children that have suffered from hydrocephalus and they easily appear to match this skull. And just like you said "If this were a human and the human head was this deformed it would not live very long... you can't have these kind of abnormalities and live a very long life span." Explaining why they died as a child.
Of course who knows what's possible. Just saying.
Video Responses
All Comments (165)
-
He recently was here in South Africa with the science and Ufo Conference and he spoke about this starchild skull. Very smart and sincere fellow, very promising research, he has LOTS of information
-
Whoa trippy...thanks for posting this..."liked"
-
@guanajuato1987 Yes indeed your points are true, but I do believe the news would cover a story on aliens if and only if they are proven to be real(which in my opinion I don't think they do...we need to explore more to find out. The universe is big so there may be a possibility.). For now we don't know because it's not in the news. We can only speculate, you see. Anywho, I entitled to my opinion as you are too. All I'm doing is disagreeing¬ forcing anything on you. Have a good day :)
-
@BlueDragonFuze come on now you think the main stream media will cover a story about aliens that they cannot discredit... theres so much real news out there the MAIN stream media dosent show... or should i say dosent want you to know.
being unable to recover nuclear dna is not proof that said nuclear dna is non human. In fact this is a 100% human skull of a person with Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria syndrome-look it up.
shadtek 1 month ago
@shadtek You have not looked at the evidence so you have no idea what this skull is because you are guessing. The facts are clear and you should go look into Lloyd Pye and the Starchild skull if you truly want to know the truth. If you want to say stupid things without even investigating a little further to see that 10% of the genome of this skull has already been identified and this skull is 100% NOT human, it is alien with alien mother and father than I have no need to debate w/U
goforitrandy 1 month ago
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but the latest DNA tests show that the Starchild skull (actually of an adult) has human mitochondrial (maternal) DNA (from outside the nucleus) but entirely alien nuclear DNA, thereby proving that this creature was the result of genetic engineering using a human egg cell and alien DNA from alien father and alien mother. A human probably gave birth to this creature. Is that right?
SuperMagnetizer 3 months ago
@SuperMagnetizer Yes your right, it gets a little confusing unless you have a PhD in DNA sequencing but your right. I'm not really sure why they (ETs) would do that but they must have a reason for it...
goforitrandy 3 months ago
did u just keep a photo holding that fossil and made this video??
anticlimax18 4 months ago
@anticlimax18 No, video still on TV...
goforitrandy 4 months ago