Principles That Makes My Engine SUPER-EFFICIENT ( Part 3 , please read below)

MODEL 1: Observe that the red portion shown is the amount the crankshaft rotates but the piston stroke is very little. From bottom the red portion is also the amount the crankshaft rotates but the piston stroke is again very little.
By this, no effect done to the piston ( large amount of piston delayed travel, about 35 percent loss).
In a conventional engine due to very large amount of piston delayed travel more heat energy is lost to the engine frame and jacket.

MODEL 2: Shows a very efficient way to minimize piston delayed travel by great amount. This idea should be applied to make an engine super-efficient.

MODEL 3: Shows my engine design which is almost similar to model 2 design.

MODEL 4: Proves also that a conventional engine's (model 1) piston is delayed by great amount compare to model 2 design.


FOR THE COMPLETE EXPLANATION please watch the video response below (Eliminate Conventional Engine's 30 % Piston Delayed Travel To Be Super-Efficient ).

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• automobile
• diesel
• power
• rotary
• engine
• boxer
• internal
• combustion
• entertainment
• cars
• generators
• kawasaki
• suzuki
• yamaha
• harley
• canam
• nascar
• gordon
• jeff
• race
• racing
• drag
• efficiency
• efficient
• boat
• outboard
• motorcycle
• airplane
• technology
• auto
• invention
• piston
• crankshaft

[died4hislove]

If a conventional engine's reciprocating parts ( piston & con-rod) are light weight to create minimal engine vibration, how come my engine vibrate more if i can design it's reciprocating parts ( piston & con-rod) lighter compare to a conventional engine?

[died4hislove]

FOR THE COMPLETE EXPLANATION please watch the video response below (Eliminate Conventional Engine's 30 % Piston Delayed Travel To Be Super-Efficient ).

[gabrielgabriel2000]

turn of the terrible techno trash music next time

[cbremer83]

The main issues is that you have a LOT of mass flinging around in this engine. This actually reduces efficiency a bit. Add to this the insane amount of vibration you would have. The engine would be then need balancing shafts of some kind to keep the vibrations down. All this vibration is both uncomfortable for drivers/users of the engine plus will result in the engine beating it's self to death.

[stompyonos]

Your oval gear shape has the same kind of "delay", specifically because of the oval shape. If you made it square, that would be a different story. However oval shape is desired, provides a more gradual change in momentum.

[DougRH52]

What is going to hold the rack gears against the small pinion (shaft)?

[motormonkey]

Read a kinematics of mechanisms book.

[motormonkey]

Your design performs almost exactly the same as a normal 4-cycle engine, the only difference being that your engine will suffer great mechanical losses because of the quick changes in momentum of your gear configuration. That's the wonderful thing about the crank shaft mechanism. The change in momentum at TDC and BDC (top-dead-center and bottom-dead-center if you didn't already know that) is smooth, so losses are minimized.

[motormonkey]

The crankshaft is designed to have little travel near the mid-point and end of the cycle. It is a sliding mechanism. It is at these points in the cycle that the gasses are being pressurized. The crank shaft also has to have time to become vertical, as this will decrease stresses in the shaft (because it is now being loaded axially).

[moparman240]

Yes the conventional crank shaft has minimal movement at the ends of the stroke however this modle #3 has absolutly zero movement for almost 180 degrees of crank gear travle and the whole time the block has to slide from one side to the other. We build modles to test theorys and this modle visably shows the flaws. Dont think of it as a failure just a discovery of one more way that does not work.

[TheGodziLac]

This is interesting, you live in the Philippines, but the music at 1m40s sounds Hungarian. Where can you get there Hungarian pop music?

By the way, your engine would be impressive, but wouldn't it be proun to strong vibration at higher revs? Although the Wankel-engine should have the same problem and we know that everything can be balanced. And what about the friction?