The pilot episode of PRI's POP 101 series, this video takes a fresh, humorous approach to the demographic issues facing the world today. Be sure to watch the sequel here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBS6f-JVvTY
Visit www.overpopulationisamyth.com and spread the word: the world is not overpopulated!
@pronatalist out of all the women i've been with married women are always the best.BTW if you 2 need help having another kid let me know..i'll help any way i can.
Pat9201 6 hours ago
@pronatalist Your idea may make $ if you establish a following, or bear fruit married to Neil Adams' growing Earth sophistry :-) Increasing human numbers already have negative impacts on the natural world and everyone in it. Population growth will be "checked", either violently by war, pestilence and famine (which is maybe what you wish to fulfill biblical prophesy), or in a preemptive gentle exercise of our choice (God given or otherwise) to correct the destructive upward trend :-)
elrjames777 7 hours ago
@marmaladekamikaze Sorry: I initially missed the Captain planet analogy: wasn't he illustrated by Neil Adams, the same guy that advocates the spurious 'Growing Earth' theory: I bet he made a ton of money out of that idea: perhaps our friend list would like to do the same: no reason why he shouldn't if his foolish notions catch on :-)
elrjames777 8 hours ago
@Pat9201
Many people who marry, are happier, live longer, and they have somebody to share their joys and burdens with.
Why are you glad to not have gotten married? Can't find anybody you love enough?
Who will take care of you, when you get old? No spouse, nor any children?
So is it so great, to not have any proper moral outlet for sex?
I'd love to face the prospect of my wife saying, "Honey, I have some good news. I'm pregnant again." Then we can rejoice God again for blessing us.
pronatalist 9 hours ago
@marmaladekamikaze
To say that we can only have hot fusion, but not cold fusion, is like saying that computers can only work, using "hot" vacuum tubes. They did once make computers that way, but the "cold" transistors works so much more efficiently, with far longer run times between failures, and they run so much faster.
Cold fusion does not violate any laws of physics. Nuclear cold fusion batteries also deplete. But they deplete so slowly, they'd last the life of the product
pronatalist 9 hours ago
@marmaladekamikaze I am not claiming anything other than an opportunity to test the assertion pronatalist makes that exponential growth "appears to be what God designed"
elrjames777 9 hours ago
@marmaladekamikaze
How much would you be willing to pay, for AA or AAA "nuclear" batteries. Well I'm pretty sure that they won't be powered by "hot fusion."
How much more useful would my cordless phone handsets be, if I could replace the rechargeable AAAs with nuclear AAAs? I would never have to think of when they need to be recharged. I pay as much for nuclear AAAs, as what I paid for the phone sets. That would just be way too cool.
Cold fusion isn't risky. Works or doesn't
pronatalist 9 hours ago
@marmaladekamikaze
Don't scoff at cold fusion, if there might be something to it. That's what evil NWO criminal elites would want you to do, for they don't want you to have free energy of any type. They want you to pay "through the nose" for everything. But such revolutionary technologies could transform the world in radical ways beneficial to even the poor. Imagine a laptop that needs no electricity, nor recharging, in a dark village of Africa. Electricity w/o power plants.
pronatalist 9 hours ago
@marmaladekamikaze
The term "cold fusion" isn't so much in fashion anymore. The term is more like "low energy nuclear reactions." Perhaps they don't like the term fusion, because it's not the high-energy kind we have heard of, and it does not produce radioactivity. But it does produce excess heat from somewhere.
It is reproducable, but not easily. And they still aren't exactly sure why it works.
Is it hoax? Then watch YT videos for entertainment. Some are actually GOOD.
pronatalist 9 hours ago
@marmaladekamikaze
"Perpetual motion machine" is an example of free energy, that is rumored to exist, but nobody has ever seen one? Something that mysteriously runs itself, without consuming energy from the grid, and running up a power bill.
1. Tap thermal energy from the air. Supposedly a violation of the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, but I think it's just a general observation, not a "law" really.
2. Better, miniaturized nuclear reactors or "nuclear batteries."
3. Zero-point
pronatalist 9 hours ago