Michael Caine corners Jack the Ripper part 4 of 4
Uploader Comments (alanheath2)
Video Responses
All Comments (17)
-
I DO believe very deeply even though it hurts that jtr was yes DR GULL and NETLEY but as MR KNIGHT said there was a 3rd party SICKERT. PCORNWALL s book is a very good read and it makes alot of sense if we r trying 2 solve a 120+yr crime with 22nd century methods his behaviour does fit really well GULL & NETLEY well they fit nicely 2 i know SIR WG had a stroke in 1887 but i know as a medical man myself if u r able 2 walk back on your own after a stroke as he did he can do anything.JTR was all3men
-
@alanheath2 - certainly, I'm not disputing the Ripper is a very interesting study - not sure if that's a good thing for anyone to say, but it's true - I think getting the "real" ripper story out there is important, but other than the inevitable internal police and wider community politics of the day, one's basically looking at an early police investigation, into just another madman who happened get a name and was mostly likely locked away in lunatic asylum.
-
@mmmail1969 Maybe a 'modest' scale but the first person ever anywhere to sell one million copies of a daily newspaper (albeit indirectly)
-
@48alfaone I think if that is to be done then the killer needs to be named. Maybe if the killer is the man I suggest in my film then that may make quite a good film - although no doubt would be highly controversial.
-
@48alfaone - I think one of the problems is, when you strip away the outright mythology and the accumulated mystic of the Ripper, to be honest, there's not a whole lot there - a "modest" scale serial killer, who was no doubt a deeply troubled person of probably modest intellect - it would need someone of real ability to pull together such a below average story subject and keep peoples interest for the duration of a movie. Might happen.....one day!
-
@mmmail1969 I agree! A realistic proper movie based on the facts should be made. The true story of the ripper crimes is owed this for the sake of history.
-
@48alfaone - yes, there is little doubt it was likely Kominski (or a very similar personality type) - it was never a member of royalty or anyone associated with royalty and it is a shame that movies have being made, which reduce the story of the Ripper and his unfortunate victims to the level of silliness, just to have more "sexy" story to tell or better put to "sell" - perhaps one day, a "realistic" modern movie of the Ripper will be made.....one day!
-
@canuckiewookie It was on the telly in 1988 - that is where this comes from, I 'rediscovered' the ending had survived on a tape holding something else. I am very glad you appreciated it, it makes it worthwhile for me!!
Great TV drama .Had recorded it on TV when aired back in the day...I'm gonna watch it again some day...
mokacode 4 months ago
@mokacode The whole thing was uploaded to you tube by someone. The quality is better than I have as this was recorded from the telly with a rather weak aeriel in 1988.
alanheath2 4 months ago