DVD Version INTRO Individualism vs Collectivism
Uploader Comments (PeacefulKancer)
All Comments (19)
-
@Holyw4ffl3 That's why God speaks to his Prophet today. That book, made 1685 years ago, have been grossly misinterpreted because everyone who has is missing the Spirit of Prophecy.
-
@engine2truck6: I like the moderator's viewpoint, but you are correct in that the story of Robin Hood is of a character who STOLE BACK the money taken from the villagers which they themselves produced. This doesn't mean that one can make a metaphor to the opposite however, a lot of stories can be used to argue either side....Like that book finished 1685 years ago, for instance...
-
E2T6: Thank you. There is actually a lot of conflicting data out there about RH. Many sources say he stole from the rich. Others say he simply fought against Sheriff of Nottingham and Prince John who were tyrannts.
If he did indeed take from the State, then I wonder if he returned what was taken from each or did he distribute it evenly.
If he gave back what was taken then he is anti-socialist. If he gave back equal $ to everyone regardless of $ in, then he is socialist.
Interesting!
-
After some research: Robin Hood was a TAX PROTESTER. He "stole" money from the Sheriff of Nottingham, who was collecting TAXES on behalf of the rich King. He returned money taken by force on behalf of the STATIST, and returned it to those who PRODUCED it. He was not a socialist.
-
I am not the originator of the video, just a re-uploader.
As for Robin Hood... As far as I know, he stole from the rich and gave to the poor. Thus making him a representative of socialist government.
-
Peaceful: you are a clear thinker. Thanks for posting and great responses to your detractors! I don't know if you are right about the legend of Robin Hood... I thought he took money from the tax collector and returned it to those who earned it. That would put him on the side of the individualist.
-
How about... Nobody cares. you cannot verify your testimony and I cannot prove that I did not do something.
Therefore, the point is null.
You started with an insult. My FIRST response to you was that I was not going to debate you if you were just going to start with insults.
Get with the program.
-
LOL. Just so everyone knows, I'm not the one confused here - I've written multiple comments on both videos and now they're gone, so my complaint is valid for both comment streams (you coward and now liar).
As for starting out with insults, if you hadn't deleted my oldest comments it would be clearly visible that the only dipshit beginning their intervention with aggressive comments here is your new friend LIHBE.
So you can both kiss my ass while hugging eachother. ;)
This series blew my mind, thank you it will most definitely help out with my social class!
lolozoic 1 year ago
@lolozoic Watch out. You talk about this stuff in class and people are going to call you all sorts of names. People don't want to hear the truth.
PeacefulKancer 1 year ago