Russian Nuclear Arsenal

the Russian Nuclear Arsinal is shown.
the video shows a variety of Nuclear vehicles used by the Russian Strategic Missile Forces such as (Bombers, Submarines, Missiles, and Mobile Launch Vehicles)
vehicles shown include the:
Bombers: Tu-95, Tu-160, and Tu-22M maritime strike craft
Submarines: Delta-III, Delta-IIII, Typhoon, the Borei class sub has just been put to water for the first time so there arent many good pictures yet... so i decided not to include that in the video... but the Borei is officially a part of the Nuclear Arsinal as of early 2007
Missiles: SS-18, SS-19, SS-N-30, SS-N-20, SS-20, SS-27, SS-24, and SS-25

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Russia
• Russian
• army
• nuclear
• bomb
• Tu-160
• SS-18
• SS-27
• Topol-M
• Missiles
• ICBM
• SLBM

[S3nap]

NATO vs Russia? USA vs Russia? No... CHINA vs RUSSIA! Chinese need oil, gass, coal. They need Siberia. Chinese have now J-20 (stealth bombarder), anti-naval missile Tung-Feng 21... And "new" russian Bulava? 25yr old Topol-M is better.

[bittemeinrammstein]

@S3nap - nah, you simply do not understand Bulava... Bulava is level of 6th generation SLBM, who is 100% new type of missile. J-20 will not even be deployed until 2019, and even that dont have even basic knowledge of his perameters. DF-21D is impressive, but what can he do against Russian superior cruise missiles who will strike his possition before he can even be properly deployed. You think China have the power to take Russia? xaxa... you need knowledge of weapons and capbilities kid. ;)

[NaiIfaks]

go Russia fuck NATO and make me free !

[norbertobreda]

Russia vs. USA = 10:1

[Firelife3]

Atleast russians did test the worlds most powerful nuclear bomb =)

[KDavidson828]

What is really funny about this video are the clips of U.S. nuclear tests. One specific one is the Marshall Island test. The creator of this video is using US Nuclear might to show Russian Nuclear might lol.

[cordata51]

@Scukov

coincidently our 4th great communist leader Barrack Obama insists to blame Wall Street for the mess when it was Clinton who forced them by law to do what they did, not only force them but Clinton set up panels to create ways of making it happen, it wasnt wall street that created financial derivatives it was Clinton and his advisors. Now all we hear from Obama is tax the rich, tax Big Oil, Take over healthcare... Search Pravda Article: "american capitalism gone with a whimper"

[cordata51]

@Scukov

Everything was fine while economy was doing good from 1996-2007. But as soon as third commy leader Nancy Pelosi took speaker of house posisiton in Januaray 2007 she got on tv n said how horrible economy was and how they need to raise taxes in impose Wind-Fall taxes on oil companies. Her speech sent huge bombs all over economy and within 2 months we went from excellent economy lowest inflation lowest unemployment to our current mess started by Clinton triggered by Pelosi

[cordata51]

@Scukov

before Clintons changes u need 20% downpayment, must show 2 years consistent income and montly payment no more then 25% of monthly income, after Clinton No downpayment required, only must show 1 month income and could get loan on upto 80% monthly income. Result: everyone got loans, every american city at least tripled in size with all new houses and businesses going up, property values sky rocketed cause there so many buyers with pre-approved loans. It was a "ticking time bomb"

[cordata51]

@Scukov

Wall Street problems created by the communists leaders of the USA. First great commy leader Jimmy Carter created "Community Reinvestment Act" in 1977, stated purpose to allow lower income people to get loans to buy a home. Second commy leader Bill Clinton added in 1995 stiff fines and threatened to close down lending agencies if they didnt comply. Result: anyone was issued a loan almost no turn downs and u didnt even need a down payment. They created new loans "interest only" etc etc

[cordata51]

@Scukov

Tanks created by soviets where never used directly against NATO as far as i know, and one can conclude based on propaganda that they were built for defending russia from NATO, but one also must conclude based on facts and actual testomony from people who lived through it that these tanks WERE used against their own people multiple times. dont understand y u do not respond about famine, yet u bring up Wall Street. there is nothing wrong with Wall Street, its communist propaganda

[cordata51]

@Scukov

Sorry honest mistake my mind was thinking Hugary, my fingers said Holland. 1953 East Germany uprising, Hungarian Revolution of 1956, Prague Spring and the 1968 invasion of Czechoslovakia, not to mention many other revolts like crack down on Polands Solidarity organization. I mean they even had to build a wall and arm it with auto firing machine guns to keep their people in. I am not saying Russia is not a beautiful country i am only saying their political history is nothing to cheer

[Scukov]

@cordata51 These tanks was built to protect glorious Soviet Union from North Atlantic Terrorist Organization (NATO). Read YOUR history from 1945-2011, my brainwashed friend, just type in Google "VICTIMS OF NATO 1945-2011" or "VICTIMS OF AMERICA 1945-2011" or "AMERICAN PEACEMAKING 1945-2011". And you don't need to have a tanks to suppress civilians, look at Wall Street right now (10/2011).

Russia occupied "holland" in 1950-1960? WTF?