Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (1,672)
-
@RimshotKiller Hitchens agreed with most of what Bush 'lied through every damn hole' about in defence of the war, though.
-
@GiantSandles Bush lied through every damn hole he could find in his body to wage war against Iraq, while Hitchens was able to make his point of view understandable. Even if some of the arguments were the same, Bush just vomited them out, hitchens actually used reason to think his points out. Even if i dont agree with him on the iraq war, setting him on the same level with somebody like bush isnt reasonable
-
@JayJayAbels Not really, his arguments weren't any different from those put forward by the neo-cons.
-
@NormacHC indeed... since never. Out of all the reasons to support the Iraq war or the 'war on terror', he had the most progressive reasons to do it ever. i.e. Humanitarian intervention and social-liberalism respectively.
-
@manonthemount outclasses Cenk intellectually? Based on what? if anything its super close. No outclassing between either of them. just a difference of opinion where Hitch is wrong. Simply wrong.
-
Since when is Hitchens a consevative?
I've been a member of the TYT army for years but Hitchens completely outclasses Cenk intellectually. I'm embarrassed to see Cenk even attempt to reproach
manonthemount 6 months ago 74
@SuperHappyCow I agree, but I agree more with Hitchens. Bush was a moron. Hitch is not, and his reasons shouldn't be generalized into the nonsense that Bush spewed.
RytanEmpire 5 months ago 11