Jerusalem second UFO hoax - simple audio analysis

Subtracting audio channels reveals that the sound was studio-produced by combining a mono background with some stereo clips containing the dialogue plus some noise.

One possible scenario: the first video was shot on the scene, audio not heavily manipulated. Background noise for the second video was recorded with a low-end phone (mono) to make it sound more authentic. Stereo sound bits from the first video were mixed over this.

For the record, audio specs of the original YouTube video:
MP4A, bitrate 96kbps, 44.1 kHz, "genuine" (not joint) stereo.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• jerusalem
• ufo
• hoax
• eliagel
• shshsh331
• debunked
• fake
• center
• cancel
• mono
• stereo
• audio
• debunk
• audacity
• signal
• second
• 2nd
• dome
• rock

[astrallife]

Please explain: you download the video's audio, and was recorded on stereo??? Cause even was beeing edited on a studio with stereo mixing, and after was uploaded as mono, your theory is does not exist. Only if you recorded the sound on a software, and the right channel was different from the left. Then, ok. You are right.

[janne808]

Desktop compositing software makes hoaxing ufos a snap these days, no trashcan lids and fishing string involved like in the good old days.