Talking Equality

http://wakingupnow.com
The next step in our battle will be to talk to EVERYONE we know about marriage equality. This is my first stab at developing a set of answers to our opponents' objections. I hope it can help prepare people and give them confidence for those one-to-one conversations that will win us equality.

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• gay
• marriage
• same-sex
• same
• sex
• lesbian
• polygamy
• pedophilia
• bestiality
• maggie
• gallagher
• national
• organization
• for
• bill
• o'reilly
• hardball
• hrc

[fuggimotto]

@dave4him4dave And what if you got it wrong and God is fine with gay marriage? Will your arguments win? I find it fascinating how well you know what God thinks... Oh, you got it from the Bible? Well then I suppose you also agree that if a man rapes a virgin, he must pay her father a dowry and take her hand in marriage. It's in the Bible, not too far from man shall not lie with man. Accept both, or deny both, or leave now and never come back.

[Kurotaka]

@fruitycunt Hahaha wow. Your ignorance actually made me laugh. NO, homosexuals do NOT have the same rights as heterosexuals. Heterosexuals are free to marry people they LOVE. In many places, homosexuals can't do that.

[dave4him4dave]

We all will die one day, we all will meet our Maker, (God). Will your arguments change His mind? (rhetorical question of course) I hope you reconsider before 'your' day comes my friend. Peace..out

[effinbastard]

youre a faggot

[alonsovelasquez2]

could anyone put spanish captions to this excelent video? this way we could spread it much further

[Flurolamp]

@hairycocsak1 Homosexuals are not paedophiles. You obviously don't know anything about what you're talking about, so kindly fuck off.

[Flurolamp]

@fruitycunt Are you actually retarded?

[fruitycunt]

faggots are free to marry people of the opposite sex just like everyone else!

[Leonicdragon]

That was a very good breakdown. My only stipulation is that marriage IS a religious act and is only de jure through the 1st amendment. Otherwise it is de facto. Since the state can't dictate religion, they cannot debate what is de jure and de facto; that power goes to the religious official who observes the ceremony. therefore "traditional marriage" is still protected if they'd just recognize de facto partnerships and le tthe churches debate about what's de jure.

[robertds1962]

it is dictatorship. that is what it is. we have been hear since we came out of the caves, but we are still not equal. it is wrong we will be free .