T-90 It's really hard to be the best

Video about Russian T-90
Music: Alisa - Moya Voyna(My war)

You can download my military pictures from
http://vitalykuzmin.net


Dear Visitors and Friends, PLEASE SUBSCRIBE to my channel. Lets make military videos the most subscribed on YouTube. SUB 4 SUB is also allowed. Just sub me, i will sub you back.

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• tanks
• army
• military
• weapon
• russia
• ussr
• t-90
• tank
• video

[HostileSausage]

lmao it's so sad that there isn't a single video about tanks without people hating on other countries. Doesn't matter if it's an Abrams, Leaopard, T90, or a Challenger. what a bunch of retards

[sergeikozin47]

@Blueatchley12 i respect your opinion, i think both tanks are best. but it really depends on the crew, if the tank crew is idiots, tank will be useless.

[sergeikozin47]

@killerbear1339 if you shoot it in front of course, but id you shoot it in the side abrams will look like a mashed potato. M1 Abrams is just like a Tiger Tank...

[kallacomb]

@killerbear1339 The SMAW would be worthless against the T-90's Kontakt-5/composite armour blend and with a maximum range of only 550 yards its not that great to begin with. Also, the AT-4 is Swedish, not American. It, too, would not penetrate the T-90 due to the composite armour and Kontakt-5, which provide over 1,000mm RHA equivalent protection. AT-4 penetrates 400mm maximum of steel plate (which is out of date). The T-90 also features an infrared laser jammer for use against missiles.

[MarshallJukov]

@killerbear1339

As it was told here many times - DU is WORST material to be chosen as armor, its just as tough as steel but 3 times heavier - which means you can tank 3 times LESS of it in same mass limit. In addition M1 has very poor mass/volume index of 3,0. While T-90 has it 4,28 tonnes per 1m^3

Javelin has no use againt any modern tank simply because its very poor range which puts its team even within coax MG range, and its whole MINUTE launch sequence.

[MarshallJukov]

@killerbear1339

RPG-7 penetrated M1 hands down, in fact its upper glacis just 50mm at 82 degrees, sides just 57mm-25mm, and turret`s rear and rear sides 50-57mm. Even WW2 artillery and bazooka can do it with no actual problems, Hell modern 25-30mm APFSDS rounds do that. And for example there was occasion when M1 Abrams was hit by T-55`s (Type 59) 100mm BR412 round into it`s side and that round just went through opposite side.

[MarshallJukov]

@killerbear1339

Nope sorry but its 5 seconds at best, 8 seconds in average and only when tank standing still.

watch?v=Ns5NJVa_XKo

T tanks however do it like this:

watch?v=TbKX_Ldpwp8

[killerbear1339]

@MarshallJukov for you auto loader it take an auto loader 5 seconds to load and an american tank crew 3 seconds to load so take that out of your aurgument

[killerbear1339]

@satanic666sonic hey buddy the past is the past but yes lets reflect it will go exsactly the same way i think the abrams and leapored are close to being the same in vs. each other but i think abrams is a little better but it will be just like ww2 20 shermans for every german tank or in this case 10 abrams for every leapored america can probably outproduce any country except china

[killerbear1339]

@AndoverWarrior3231 i agree its about the penatrating power

[killerbear1339]

@HostileSausage i couldnt agree more lets think of it this way if the t 90 and challenger leapored and abrams were on the same team no one could stop them nobody and i would hate to see the day that we have to find out wich tank is better

[killerbear1339]

@sergeikozin47 thats no true rpg 7 connot penatrate abrams do some research rpg cant penatrate abrams armor because of the ceramic plating depeleted uranium and some other clessified stuff and dont say it can because the only ones who truely know are the ones who build them and if you want to get into anti tank weaponry america is the best they have the smaw wich would destroy t-90 the the at-4 wich would decamate a t-90 and you have the javilline wich would obliterate t-90