My dad has a 88' Testarossa and we clocked his 0-60 time at 4.9 seconds. But my dads friends 512 tr clocked at 4.5 seconds. So 3.6 is not so accurate.
dude, u say it redlines at 8,000 RPM, then the camera points to the rev tacho and it clearly shows that redline starts BEFORE 7,000 RPM!! u dumb retard! seriously. how can such a WANKER drive a Ferrari!
I have owned 3 Testarossas over the last 8 years or so, and they are deceptively fast, but not really quick off the line. I have done mods to my current one, like no cats, hollowed precats, etc. It runs good but still not near 3.6 seconds to sixty. May I ask how you are gathering that data? Are you using GPS or a G-TechPro? As I said these cars are quicker than people think though...I raced a 1968 Dodge Charger with a 440 six-pack and I beat it in a drag race from a 10mph roll.
@manuntd2009 Sorry I was out of line with some of my comments in my last email. There is no reason to lie about something so stupid. Yep I always seem to invest in things that go down such as real estate, the stock market, bonds and cars. At least with the cars you can have some fun but it still gets old. I was thinking about getting rid of the Ferrari. I have my eye on a really nice Piper turbo Arrow. Cruses at 170 knots seats six and has a service ceiling of 20,000 feet. Talk about fun
@ronindeve i'd rather invest my money in something that goes up in value and not down, unless your a multimillionare then its pointless to have a ferrari...so your saying that your 1986 testarosa is almost as fast as a 2006 ferrari enzo...something doesnt make sense here...anyway it just looks bad and it seems like your lieing.
My dad has a 88' Testarossa and we clocked his 0-60 time at 4.9 seconds. But my dads friends 512 tr clocked at 4.5 seconds. So 3.6 is not so accurate.
madeinchina68 7 months ago
dude, u say it redlines at 8,000 RPM, then the camera points to the rev tacho and it clearly shows that redline starts BEFORE 7,000 RPM!! u dumb retard! seriously. how can such a WANKER drive a Ferrari!
SaberToothedLion 8 months ago
ain'ts you bitches tow any trailer hitches
SeeProfileForDetails 1 year ago
I have owned 3 Testarossas over the last 8 years or so, and they are deceptively fast, but not really quick off the line. I have done mods to my current one, like no cats, hollowed precats, etc. It runs good but still not near 3.6 seconds to sixty. May I ask how you are gathering that data? Are you using GPS or a G-TechPro? As I said these cars are quicker than people think though...I raced a 1968 Dodge Charger with a 440 six-pack and I beat it in a drag race from a 10mph roll.
yost112ty 1 year ago
@uglybassplayer14 6.3 :))
donzaxspeed 1 year ago
@ronindeve I have a Testarossa too, and a Ford GT (modified 740+whp, dynoed at 737whp before exhaust mods) A 360 spider and a Mondial.
That testarossa doesnt run 0-60 in 3.6. It really doesnt.
mooresalex 1 year ago
3.6 lol........
BOILY128 1 year ago
Ferrari's first supercar? Brush up on your Italian automotive hirtory, dude.
TheFlatheadpete 1 year ago
@manuntd2009 Sorry I was out of line with some of my comments in my last email. There is no reason to lie about something so stupid. Yep I always seem to invest in things that go down such as real estate, the stock market, bonds and cars. At least with the cars you can have some fun but it still gets old. I was thinking about getting rid of the Ferrari. I have my eye on a really nice Piper turbo Arrow. Cruses at 170 knots seats six and has a service ceiling of 20,000 feet. Talk about fun
ronindeve 1 year ago
@ronindeve i'd rather invest my money in something that goes up in value and not down, unless your a multimillionare then its pointless to have a ferrari...so your saying that your 1986 testarosa is almost as fast as a 2006 ferrari enzo...something doesnt make sense here...anyway it just looks bad and it seems like your lieing.
manuntd2009 1 year ago