@cruisersism Regardless of whether or not he ever could have been convicted, you cannot say something happened until you can come up with proof. Circumstantial vagueness, incoherent rambling, and baseless conjecture amount to nothing. They nailed Nixon; they could have nailed LBJ if they'd have had something to nail him with.
@jono11 You know sometimes the truth is right in front of you but some are blind to see it. If the head shot is not proof of an conspiracy then you are ?
@cruisersism 1) The History Channel is notorious for fudging the facts until they're called on it. This fits that pattern.
2) Barr McClellan is a convicted forger.
3) It doesn't matter how many conspiracy authors you bring to the table, dozens if not hundreds of historians have studied the matter exhaustively and found that your superstition has no merit. No more of this circumstantial garbage. SHOW. ME. THE. PROOF.
@cruisersism "The History Channel responded by assembling a panel of three historians, Robert Dallek, Stanley Kutler, and Thomas Sugrue...[who] agreed that the documentary was not credible and should not have aired. The History Channel issued a statement saying, in part, [that] ''The Guilty Men'' failed to offer viewers context and perspective, and fell short of the high standards that the network sets for itself. The History Channel apologizes to its viewers.'"
I wish he had died of lung cancer.
MrRobertJameson 1 week ago
This was originally telecast on Sunday, March 31, 1968.
fromthesidelines 2 months ago
Just because they did not nail him does not mean he had nothing to do with the assassination, as i said before he had everything to gain from it.
cruisersism 3 months ago
@cruisersism Regardless of whether or not he ever could have been convicted, you cannot say something happened until you can come up with proof. Circumstantial vagueness, incoherent rambling, and baseless conjecture amount to nothing. They nailed Nixon; they could have nailed LBJ if they'd have had something to nail him with.
jono11 3 months ago
@jono11 When one controls the evidence as did LBJ and the FBI along with others the assassination of JFK will never go to a court of law in Amercia.
cruisersism 3 months ago
@cruisersism Proof of a conspiracy would be, you know, proof that would hold up in a court of law.
jono11 3 months ago
@jono11 You know sometimes the truth is right in front of you but some are blind to see it. If the head shot is not proof of an conspiracy then you are ?
cruisersism 3 months ago
@cruisersism 1) The History Channel is notorious for fudging the facts until they're called on it. This fits that pattern.
2) Barr McClellan is a convicted forger.
3) It doesn't matter how many conspiracy authors you bring to the table, dozens if not hundreds of historians have studied the matter exhaustively and found that your superstition has no merit. No more of this circumstantial garbage. SHOW. ME. THE. PROOF.
jono11 3 months ago
@jono11 The History Channel apologizes to its viewers. I wonder why? Have you read
Blood, Money & Power by Barr McClellan (2003)
cruisersism 3 months ago
@cruisersism "The History Channel responded by assembling a panel of three historians, Robert Dallek, Stanley Kutler, and Thomas Sugrue...[who] agreed that the documentary was not credible and should not have aired. The History Channel issued a statement saying, in part, [that] ''The Guilty Men'' failed to offer viewers context and perspective, and fell short of the high standards that the network sets for itself. The History Channel apologizes to its viewers.'"
What's next, Coast to Coast AM?
jono11 3 months ago