The Police State - HR 6304 The End of The 4th Amendment part 2.

SEC. 803. PREEMPTION.

(a) In General- No State shall have authority to--

(1) conduct an investigation into an electronic communication service provider's alleged assistance to an element of the intelligence community;

(2) require through regulation or any other means the disclosure of information about an electronic communication service provider's alleged assistance to an element of the intelligence community;

(3) impose any administrative sanction on an electronic communication service provider for assistance to an element of the intelligence community; or

(4) commence or maintain a civil action or other proceeding to enforce a requirement that an electronic communication service provider disclose information concerning alleged assistance to an element of the intelligence community.

(b) Suits by the United States- The United States may bring suit to enforce the provisions of this section.

(c) Jurisdiction- The district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction over any civil action brought by the United States to enforce the provisions of this section.

(d) Application- This section shall apply to any investigation, action, or proceeding that is pending on or commenced after the date of the enactment of the FISA Amendments Act of 2008.

Source:
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h110-6304

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• HR 6304
• HR6304
• end of the 4th amendment
• corrupt government
• FISA
• impeach bush
• impeachment
• impeaching george bush
• new world order
• illuminati
• north american union
• amero
• civil liberties
• removing liberty
• truth
• NAFTA superhighway
• the constitution

[vessobesso]

USA is going slowly but sure into undercovered dictatorship of the capital...

[KineticRic]

People think this whole surveillance of Americans is new, but it isn't.

It actually started at the NSA in 1994 under the Bill Clinton dictatorship.

It was called the "Echelon" project and was Top Secret till about 2002.

[GJonathanWIII]

so his response to "how could democrats pass this bill" did not mention that obama voted for it, but then did mention how it would be fixed by obama. of course he voted for it and of course his clerics voted for it because they want obama to be able to do anything because "he's our all knowing savior" and we wouldnt want something like our rights to stand in the way of "His" vision.

[Itztli87]

congress is a shriveled, useless entity full of over-paid old men with no teeth or enforcement ability.

welcome to the age of New Global Fascism

[Itztli87]

you're a naive idiot

[BlackRadical001]

i dont know why the would want to listen to my calls im boring as fuck

[haansgruber]

from what the Constitution itself purports to authorize. He has heretofore written much, and could write much more, to prove that such is the truth. But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain --- that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist.

peace :)

[haansgruber]

except as they may be forced to do so at the point of the bayonet, it is perhaps of no importance what its true legal meaning, as a contract, is. Nevertheless, the writer thinks it proper to say that, in his opinion, the Constitution is no such instrument as it has generally been assumed to be; but that by false interpretations, and naked usurpations, the government has been made in practice a very widely, and almost wholly, different thing

[haansgruber]

Actually if you review it carefully you'll find the constitution is like everything else they have instituted. It's illegal according to their own contract law.

I suggest reading Lysander Spooner: No Treason; Constitution of No Authority.

Inasmuch as the Constitution was never signed, nor agreed to, by anybody, as a contract, and therefore never bound anybody, and is now binding upon nobody; and is, moreover, such an one as no people can ever hereafter be expected to consent to,

[pkaddyscim]

no actually its not.

[markyannone]

Learn to recognize unconstitutional, void legislation. Congress and the president have no power to change the Constitution. The Constitution is unchanged and intact.

[Keruaran]

Former (and short lived) leader of the Australian Labor Party described U.S. President George W. Bush as "the most incompetent and dangerous president in living memory".

He was derided and chastised for saying such a thing at the time. But I believe history will vindicate these words.