Climate change - Is CO2 the cause? - Pt 2 of 4
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like Bushvision's video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike Bushvision's video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add Bushvision's video to your playlist.
Uploaded on Sep 12, 2007
Part 2 - Professor Bob Carter examines more of the data concerning climate change and Global warming. Inconvenient Truth author Al Gore would find his presentation contradicted by this presentation? Will kyoto`s greenhouse reduction goals be in vain?
-
Category
-
License
Standard YouTube License
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
The interactive transcript could not be loaded.
Loading...
Loading...
Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Loading...
Advertisement
-
8:29
Climate Change - Is CO2 the cause? - pt 3 of 4by BushvisionFeatured
100,210
-
9:41
Climate Change - Is CO2 the cause? - Pt 1 of 4by Bushvision
370,289 views
-
9:35
Climate Change - Is CO2 the cause?- pt 4 of 4by Bushvision
113,014 views
-
9:44
Climate Change - Bob Carters 5 Tests of CO2 part 1by Bushvision
29,017 views
-
9:59
Prof Bob Carter - PART 1. ETS, Global warming, etcby rynso
5,560 views
-
32
videos
Play all
AGW pseudo-scienceby johndaddyo444
-
11:00
5. Climate Change -- isn't it natural?by potholer54
82,230 views
-
9:52
4 - Climate Change -- Gore vs. Durkinby potholer54
81,059 views
-
9:23
7. Climate Change - "Those" e-mails and science censorshipby potholer54
58,234 views
-
9:55
6. Climate Change -- Those hacked e-mailsby potholer54
276,830 views
-
Global warming
63,215 videos63
-
1:50
Evidence CO2 does not cause dangerous Global warmingby Bushvision
36,160 views
-
10:19
2. Climate Change -- the objectionsby potholer54
122,439 views
-
28:25
Facts behind "The Great Global Warning Swindle" -Part 1by Director
79,405 views
-
7:07
More Scientists don't see CO2 as temperature driverby Albertkallal
15,399 views
-
22:04
Climate Chains the Global Warming Fraud (what about 1,500 active volcanoes)by Dave Flang
15,152 views
-
8:53
8a. Climate Change - Phil Jones and the 'no warming for 15 years'by potholer54
52,602 views
-
9:40
Human Induced Climate Change - Ian Plimer (part 1 of 5)by southdb
17,937 views
-
5:25
Al Gore sued by over 30.000 Scientists for Global Warming fraud / John Colemanby Info Warrior
848,184 views
-
1:11:17
Global Warming and the Ethics of Climate Changeby UChannel
3,307 views
-
9:58
Global Warming Swindle Debate Pt6by voltscommissar
27,562 views
-
8:49
Global Warming Swindle Debate Pt4by voltscommissar
32,945 views
- Loading more suggestions...
Video Responses
All Comments (779)
troglodyte2084 2 months ago
Regarding those idiotic GW disciples, check this out "Ignorance is bliss" watch?v=6cer9t-DzQc
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
jerbiebarb 3 months ago
Who's saying that AGW has anything to do with past climate change? This is from 2007? Hopefully such an argument doesn't impress anyone 5 years later.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
grindupBaker 3 months ago
...effect last 2 years max. so he's no basis for those flat temperature lines. Instead it's correct to erase the El Nino spike and draw in a rough curve down to complete the trend then run a 26-year trend line through it all, probably be ~1.4 degrees instead of ~1.5 degrees.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
grindupBaker 3 months ago
His 26-year change rate graph at 3:19 and his ~1.5 degrees per century rate correspond to other graphs I've found (I measured currently ~1.7 degrees per century off one, close enough so if his earlier graph showing a few change rates up to ~2.5 degrees per century over the last few thousand years is correct and if those past rates were sustained for more than just a decade or so, then I concur that the present rate is unremarkable. I disagree with his El Nino step because I read El Nino...
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
grindupBaker 3 months ago
Hard to read his 6,000,000 yr temp graph at :23 on due to poor video quality and view angle but I count ~80 "blips" so that's average 75,000 years per up-down spike. "blips" are ~1 to ~5 degrees C peak-to-peak so sharpest he shows on that graph is ~5 degrees C warming to peak then ~5 degrees cooling back, in ~75,000 years. That's ~0.007 degrees per century maximum he's showing on that spikey graph of temperature shooting up & down.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Will Hart 4 months ago
Excellent specificity.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Aanthanur DC 4 months ago
no problem with questioning, your problem is that you have no evidence to falsify the AGW theory. and aslong you guys don't have any evidence, the world keeps being convinced by the evidence that has been presented. Polls show that most people are indeed convinced by the evidence and expert opinions.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
linxMuppet 5 months ago
Awesome presentation...I live how mad gw disciples get when itheir dogma is questioned
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Viracocha711 10 months ago
Most of them!!!
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Harold Ambler 1 year ago
Which fact does he have wrong please?
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube