Part 2 - Professor Bob Carter examines more of the data concerning climate change and Global warming. Inconvenient Truth author Al Gore would find his presentation contradicted by this presentation? Will kyoto`s greenhouse reduction goals be in vain?
All these references to skepticalscience... The commentary on the site's articles is better discussion of the issue than the articles themselves. The articles occasionally contain dubious contention, dubious presentation, or are flat out wrong. If that's the authoritative point of reference, there are going to be problems with with the backing evidence.
flyinggeng 2 weeks ago
@Robbob9933
"(1) True and over riding fact. This alone kills AGW."
No, it does not. Your argument is illogical; a fallacy; a non-sequitur. The Earth has been warmer than now at different times but that does NOT mean that AGW is false, or that the threat is less worrisome (there are 7 Billion people here now).
"(2) Undisputed fact by the pro-AGW folks at UEA. The trail is around 800 years."
I will write this only once: historically CO2 followed temperature BUT THIS IS NO LONGER THE CASE.
xchopp 1 month ago
@Robbob9933 Absolute rubbish. The Earth has been cooling for half a billion years but this has absolutely no relevance whatsoever to our current predicament. We could of course cool the planet without reducing CO2 emissions but it would involve introducing a lot of aerosol pollution into the stratosphere. That would be expensive and dangerous (and of course air quality would decline dramatically). Better to deal with our energy problem now, since we are going to have to anyway and soon.
xchopp 1 month ago
@Robbob9933 ...and btw, did you notice the BEST temperature record confirms all the others? Search Bad, Badder, BEST on youtube. Here's the info: "Richard Muller seemed like the last best hope of the anti-science movement. This month he published his global temperature results, and the climate denialists are up in arms. What went wrong?"
...but I suspect you just do not want to know.
xchopp 1 month ago
@Robbob9933 More rubbish. Go watch Dr. Richard B. Alley's talk at AGU 2009 Fall meeting (google: A23A) -- people, check it out, please.
xchopp 1 month ago
@xchopp (1) True and over riding fact. This alone kills AGW.
(2) Undisputed fact by the pro-AGW folks at UEA. The trail is around 800 years.
I have read the stollen then leaked e-mails and all through them was the concern that the data DID NOT agree with the AGW theory but in fact disproved it.
The goal to cut CO2 level to half of current will kill or severly stunt all plant life and reduce O2 levels accordingly.
Robbob9933 1 month ago
@Robbob9933 Rubbish.
xchopp 1 month ago