Richard Bandler Interview by Ronald Amsler 1/4

Richard Bandler Interview by Ronald Amsler 1/4

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Richard
• Bandler
• Interview
• by
• Ronald
• Amsler

[dallasgangsta187]

I Love Rich, but he looks like penguin from the 90's Batman series. lol

[Bellybeard]

Take a look at RBs pupil:

Paul McKenna - I can make you thin!

4 Episodes.

Ive been working with that method for three weeks now and ive lost over three Kilos (6 Pounds). So yeah it works. And im not specially fat at all.

I added -1hour fast walking a day- to help the fatloss out. Works great! Clothes are looser on my body now.

:)

[Yvescorbeil4life]

@whicheverwayable n

Bandler found out how to imitate the skills of amazing people It;'s not for nothing that Milton Erickson disliked him. He knew the personality of Bandler . He is a self-absorbed guru who did achieve some impressive skills but he is not a sincere teacher he is a narcissistic and I was fascinated with him years ago but the more tapes and more seminar and live shows you see the more you get to know what he is about,.Every anecdote is tainted with self absorption.

[apolit11]

CRIMINAL PSYCHIC RICHARD BANDLER IS OR WAS (NOT KNOWN IF HE IS STILL ABLE TO HOLD IT) OF AN EXTREMELY DANGEROUS ENERGY THAT WAS RUNNING THROUGH HIS BODY. IT IS BELIEVED THAT HE DESTROYED THIS ENERGY DUE TO SCHIZOPHRENIC MADNESS HE WAS GOING THROUGH AND WITHOUT THIS ENERGY BANDLER IS USELESS A TOTAL RECK, UNABLE TO FACE THE OUTSIDE WORLD. POSSIBILITY OF DEATH IS REAL DUE TO IT, BOTH MENTAL AND PHYSICAL. IT IS DEFINITE THAT HE HAS CAUSED GREAT HARM TO MANY PEOPLE WITH THIS ENERGY. SO ARE HIS FRDS

[whicheverwayable]

@cheeseburgerwalrus2 Trust me, the techniques you learned aren't NLP. I've seen so much of this from NLP gurus and practitioners, it's just other psychological techniques rehashed to sell. You have my respect for helping people, but people like Richard Bandler don't because they are just in this for the money, it astounds me what he comes out with, like all scientists are stupid etc. Most of what works in NLP is stuff that is already known from the fields of psychology he criticises.

[rainwilds]

@cheeseburgerwalrus2 Nothing new in the sense that if you do your research you'll find that NLP is just a combination of ancient teachings of occultism. You forget that humans have existed for ages.

[cheeseburgerwalrus2]

@rainwilds - "nothing new here?"

he's the guy that invented NLP. I use his techniques with hypnosis clients and I can name at least a dozen ppl who are now long term non-smokers, saving 150-300 dollars per month because I've used some of the techniques he mentioned in one of his videos. Oh yeah, and the ppl who no longer have phobias, that's another God send, too.

Thanks Richard Bandler, I appreciate what I've learned by practicing the suggestions you make. So do my clients.

:)

[rainwilds]

@whicheverwayable Yeah I totally agree. Nothing new here. My intuition tells me he's a shark.

[whicheverwayable]

@awakenthefelixwithin regarding helping people, there is much more evidence for success with schools such as positive psychology etc, this is because Bandler has stated that we can't measure NLP being that it is the structure of subjective reality. A lot of social science deals with subjective reality with the same issue yet the outcomes are still measured objectively. This should ring the alarm bells of anyone with a vested interest in NLP yet doesn't seem to concern people. NLP is commerical

[whicheverwayable]

@awakenthefelixwithin I have used NLP for years and still use it to this day, however after ten years I have slowly realised that a lot of what Bandler and Co say is overhyped nonsense and full of factual errors. What i'm saying isn't that the tools of NLP don't have success, but they can be explained far better using other sciences such as neuroscience, linguistics, cognitive psychology etc. Many tools focus on realigning cognitive bias which has been studied since the 30's.......

[awakenthefelixwithin]

@whicheverwayable ... (cont.) It is FAR less important to understand what's in a cure than it is to 'administer' that cure to as many people as possible, as quickly as possible, ensuring that we know it works and works safely. A viewpoint focused on anything but curing the patient as a primary focus is useless; the specific working of these things is useless, since the moment we have a clear causal relationship, we can get to helping people.

[awakenthefelixwithin]

@whicheverwayable It's also true that whilst Bandler is highly disdainful of the psychiatric community, it's fair: there IS a massive problem with the mainstream mental health/wellbeing community. Imagine a dry cleaner, gym, or any other business at all that took money for years before delivering a result, if it did at all? Whilst NLP typically doesn't fill in what's between A and Z, talented practitioners make sure that Z is a great result, and are too busy healing people to worry about B - Y..