David Ray Griffin at Boston University, Part 8 of 8
Uploader Comments (holyodv)
All Comments (51)
-
How is for some quotes, bitch?
John 8:31-32: "To the Jews who had believed him, Jesus said, "If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free."
-
Let me say that again. If you mix together the right constituents, then you HAVE thermite. There's no such thing as all the elements of thermite without thermite. That's nonsense. You take a beaker and mix together the proper ingredients and you've got thermite. You use small enough particles you have nanothermite. And if you mix it with latex or the like you have something you can spray on the walls of a building that will explode when a plane hits it. Finis.
-
Just a follow up: We use similar materials where I work. Nothing explosive mind you. But we were discussing a problem we were having with a process and the engineer suggested a certain chemical might have gotten into the mix. Which would produce thermite! No question of reactions or the like. Just mixing in another chemical. And that is what this discussion is all about. Whether the proper chemicals appear in a mixture in certain proportions in recognizable and distinct chunks.
-
@LordBalto We are being fucked with .Evidently my friend. Our comments and replies are being mixed up with later or earlier replies to each other or other commenters.
Im not surprised by it.
What are they afraid of? Its really comical.
-
You are implying that the constituents of the thermitic material were found randomly scattered throughout the dust, whereas they were found in discrete chunks of material the content of which was identical to thermite. Why do you insist on trying to obfuscate the obvious? You might as well argue that a duck is not a duck because the constituents of the duck are found throughout a lake, whereas those constituents are all found within a single duck.
-
Are you asking whether I think the government was involved? It's like the Kennedy assassination. There's generally only one organization capable of orchestrating a multifaceted coverup, and that's the government. No matter who appears to have been originally involved, once the coverup begins you can be pretty well assured the government is involved. And the very existence of the coverup makes that government the chief conspiracy denier, since that is the very essence of a coverup.
-
I personally do not deny any type of conspiracy.Especially the fact that governments do conspire.
Its very plain but my view is very simple to understand and i WILL continue to do my best to wake up other Human Beings to the evidence of what really happened to the WTC buildings on 9/11.
And just in case you are confused ,i tell everyone i know and point out to them,via mainstream videos of that day the glaring fact that those buildings were brought down using explosives.
-
@LordBalto "Unlike the conspiracy deniers who change the facts to fit the theory."
Who are "conspiracy deniers" is it a person or a group of persons?
Are they denying that conspiracy is possible or are they denying that conspiracy is possible within a group of persons within..lets say a government?
Again, people using foul language, ad-hominem attacks, and generally disrespectful, uncivil language will not be allowed.
holyodv 2 years ago
I'm all for open debate. After all, that's what a free democracy is all about. It is what we need with 9/11. The 9/11 Commission left many questions unasked and unanswered. Dr. Griffin is merely outlining those questions. We should know what these questions are and ask for answers.
holyodv 2 years ago
If you want to post a comment. Do so with respect toward each other and the victims of 9/11. The 9/11 Truth movement seeks truth in their honor. If you cannot keep the language respectful and your comments based on fact. I'll remove it.
holyodv 2 years ago