911 AMATEUR part3NEW

The SEPTEMBER CLUES website: http://septemberclues.info

Please watch my 90-min SEPTEMBER CLUES research documentary before leaving any comments on this video, thanks.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gORu-6...


This is a video analysis of 4 so-called "AMATEUR" shots of "flight 175" hitting WTC2 on 9/11. The inescapable conclusion is that they have all been forged to back up the poor forgeries of impacting 'airplanes' seen on LIVE TV.

THE SHOTS ARE CREDITED TO :
1 : Evan Fairbanks
2 : Luc Courchesne
3 : Michael Hezarkhani
4 : Tina Cart

Let's move on and see how this evidence can be brought to a court of law.

Please watch also:
911 AMATEUR part1 :
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=qbYAV5f...
911 AMATEUR part2 :
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=yjQmxS-...

our research forum: http://cluesforum.info

• Category

  People & Blogs

[Lourdes baby]

Who's the song by at the end of the bid? Googled the lyrics but nothing came up. Sounds a bit U2-ish....

[simonshack]

That's my song called 'Untrue', performed with my 5-piece band The Social Service. If you send me a PM, I'll let you know how to get hold of it. Thanks for your interest! :O)

[PakoS1976]

thanks very much for the great and detailed analysis of these poor amateur videos!! I strongly recommend to watch the full movie you can find a lot of interesting things!! Thanks very much Simon!!

[simonshack]

Thanks for your thanks, mate!

The full movie is here, by the way:

SEPTEMBER CLUES - full version:

watch?v=gORu-68SHpE

Please diffuse as far and wide as possible. Thanks!

[simonshack]

Well, at least I know how to spell "authoritatively" :o)

If you are a physicist yourself, you are welcome to explain what we see in the 9/11 videos - featuring aluminum airplanes melding into steel structures without a single piece of wing appendage - not even a slice of an aft aileron - shearing off on impact. All we see is a plane disappearing inside the WTC as if he building was made out of Jell-O.

So tell me now, Mr Motornut: what is your definition of 'conjecture'?

[kansasinnovember]

The planes were shitty cgi inserts.

The "vicsims" were just emotional propaganda.

And those responsible for the hoax are sitting in their ivory towers counting their share from the "victim compensation fund" and "business compensation fund" and the countless millions donated by a brainwashed public.

[BayernMunichfan21]

haha lol

[kansasinnovember]

Cheers mate...only wish I could smuggle a huge SEPTEMBERCLUES or CLUESFORUM banner into Old Trafford,but unfortunately they search us on the way in.

[BayernMunichfan21]

smartest united fan ever!

[Marc Mywords]

Dude, People see what they want to see, especially u....Really great imagination.all the planes, from all the angle's are faked,,,,yea...that's whats going on.

[supraman34]

Dont forget the inside trading

[nyr9teen9d4]

NOTHING could have taken these buildings down EXCEPT explosives. Period.

[oddizzee]

I may be wrong but the curvature of the windscreen could've been enough to reflect the flying object hitting the building..sort of like a panoramic view?

[drum clown]

yet another 911 lie.there was a bomb.thats all.no plane.i saw this video without any plane.

so the plane is in fakery.

[thatsmynamebud1]

did you make these videos all by yourself? and where do you get your knowledge form? 

[Joe Turn]

If you take away their Plane their whole cookie will crumble.War crimes against the USA will have to commence.

The government shills are working overtime trying to keep the NO PLANES and the missile attact at the Pentagram silenced.They even convinced one fellow to say that the resolution change would produce a plane,that his video could not show and he gobbled it up as if he had made a mistake,imagine that.