911 AMATEUR part3NEW

New SEPTEMBER CLUES website: http://www.septemberclues.info

Please watch all parts of SEPTEMBER CLUES before leaving any comments on this video, thanks :
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=FAFFDE39F342242C


This is a video analysis of 4 so-called "AMATEUR" shots of "flight 175" hitting WTC2 on 9/11. The inescapable conclusion is that they have all been forged to back up the poor forgeries of impacting 'airplanes' seen on LIVE TV.

THE SHOTS ARE CREDITED TO :
1 : Evan Fairbanks
2 : Luc Courchesne
3 : Michael Hezarkhani
4 : Tina Cart

Let's move on and see how this evidence - along with all the other regarding impossible collapses etc... - can be brought to a court of law.


911 AMATEUR part1 :
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=qbYAV5fCGiM&fmt=6

911 AMATEUR part2 :
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=yjQmxS-DpyM&fmt=6


To download my main 9/11 research "SEPTEMBER CLUES" in high resolution, please visit :
http://www.thesocialservice.it

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• 911
• 9/11
• fairbanks
• no
• planes
• tv
• fakery
• giuliani
• bush

[MitkoChan]

Evan left his camera on the floor or similar pointing up at the WTC. Easy enough to find if you look for it. As for the majority of the video, why is it 7 years after the incident Americans STILL don't know what artifacts are? Has Google truly censored the US, banning it from Wiki's Compression_artifact page?

[simonshack]

@MitkoChan

"7 years after"? LOL. Are you an artifact yourself? :-D

[motornut2001]

Love the comment at 5.24 - "whoever forged this shot had no notion of physics". So tell me Simon, are you a physicist? So many claims, made so authoratatively and yet completely bereft of any independent peer reviewed critique beyond the poster's opinion. I imagine much of this is video is a collection of images and statements of the owner's opinions and not a whole lot more. Conjecture, no more, no less.

[simonshack]

@motornut2001

Well, at least I know how to spell "authoritatively" :o)

If you are a physicist yourself, you are welcome to explain what we see in the 9/11 videos - featuring aluminum airplanes melding into steel structures without a single piece of wing appendage - not even a slice of an aft aileron - shearing off on impact. All we see is a plane disappearing inside the WTC as if he building was made out of Jell-O.

So tell me now, Mr Motornut: what is your definition of 'conjecture'?

[sephirothrikusora]

This is too cruel to be true. I don't understand....why? How could the US government be so cruel????????????? This is.....this is too much......this work of beyond evil. Is just pure demonic. I still don't understand. Why US government, WHY DID YOU DO THIS TO YOUR OWN PEOPLE! What sick reason you have for this???!! Oil? Money? Jews? WHY!!??

[LittleSaints01]

How can people not see the drone that was blotted out? Simon clearly points this out at 9:05 where he shows a wingless and deformed passenger jet literally being inserted on top of a blotted out smaller craft with wings using pixel dust just before it hits...

watch?v=SaBWlUIvCds

[JulietsMan]

the window would have to be lying FLAT in order to reflect and object behind it. The edge furthest from the camera view is the TOP EDGE of the window. The total refelctive surface is tilted at only a few degrees angle. 4 degrees at the most. but all the action is happening at least 3 blocks behind the car. the SKY that is reflected in the window, which extends into infinity above the car, is still only reflected from IN FRONT and directly above the car.

[JulietsMan]

@motornut2001 so motornut i guess in your world you have to be and expert before you are allowed to simply ask questions? does that about sum it up?

[GTBeauregard]

I'm not seeing the problem. You have an angled glass which is reflecting the building and plane - where's the problem? It looks to be at the appropriate angle to reflect exactly what it is reflecting.

[erasesure]

SEPTEMBER CLUES makes the most since.

[boywonderless]

@Inigo37 did you WATCH the video? lol what /plane/, what /jet/? was it the fairweather wing? the soundless ufo melding with the confused (and oftentimes), faceless building? that big, grey honker musta disintegrated, huh?

[Inigo37]

After three years of investigation, my thought: the planes was TOTALLY REAL: the first plane was a small jet, the second plane was a Big military grey plane.

[yikesoyikes1]

@gunman1977 I've got some properties I'd like to sell you in Detroit. Great neighborhood...super schools...friendly people ....you'll love it

[yikesoyikes1]

@TheDivineFortress yeah...I liked it too...and how come it took too long for the plane to come out the other side. And why was the tire in such great shape that was on the sidewalk by the fake people. Naw...I'm joshin'ya. I'm hired by govt. to debunk the debunkers.