Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

arctic sovereignty

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
421 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 5, 2007

Canada's interests in the Arctic

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (7)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • there are a few issues I'd like to suggest.

    - the NW passage shortens a shipping route so not much need to dock/resupply

    - we don't have to rescue the ships that run into danger

    - we don't have to grant flights over our territory either

    - as an international passage it puts at risk out internal shores and we have the right to ensure they are protected. thus the only way to ensure they are is to regulate our "internal waters"

    We've already had to rescue one American icebreaker!

  • sounds good, loseno canadian land, can controle the sea way and regulate it, if only these guy's could lye to the public they would make great politishions in te artic aria

  • discussion on the facts of a matter before giving an opinion on it? am i really on youtube?

  • le gars, ste video la la, c genre puissent comme le bon dieu, lgars kya fait ca, ya setter une cam dans son soo sol pi lui pi ses boys du lundi yon parler du ...... en fait g rien katcher, chow, go to texas

  • Well said indeed.

  • Excellent insight into Arctic Sovereignty.

    Very well informed and I was impressed at your proffessional lack of bias. Do you represent any organization ?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more