In Defense of the Peanut Butter Man

Life doesn't come from non life. All cells come from another cell. The jar of peanut butter is a rhetorical device - address the information not the rhetorical device. Abiogenesis is psuedoscience. It's not even a viable hypothesis.


http://www.khouse.org/pages/mcat/khouse/about_the_misslers/

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Atheist
• Evolution
• Peanut
• Butter
• Dr
• Chuck
• Missler
• abiogenesis
• christian

[Quartrez]

@AxeMan0170 Still haven't presented an argument to justify your claim, I see.

[AxeMan0170]

@Quartrez Consider it as you please, that's your prerogative.

[AxeMan0170]

@OxyMiracle It Figures, Ad hominem. It's been a pleasure.

[Quartrez]

@AxeMan0170 "Right there you are negating the work of many a physics-theorists."

Please explain. Until then, I will consider yours statement as invalid.

[OxyMiracle]

@AxeMan0170

Sorry, there isn't any point of continuing this argument. I really don't care that you feel you need to justify your faith over YouTube, convincing me God exists changes nothing in your life. Enjoy believing in God, I'd rather not - Science does not agree with religion, religion conforms around science to instill fear into people - organized religion and its propaganda has brought about some of the worst crime in history.

[AxeMan0170]

@Quartrez That is metaphysics at its best. Right there you are negating the work of many a physics-theorists.

[AxeMan0170]

@OxyMiracle It may be that I do not accept a world without God, it would certainly be more convenient for me and my selfish desires. But (un)fortunately the facts do point the other way. The argument that the Bible is no more specific in communicating how things were created is a bit weak, since it is not a science book, despite that it is very consistent with science, if you care to look more attentively, I already gave you a couple of examples. By the way your last statement: ad hominem.

[AxeMan0170]

@AxeMan0170 l) By random chance and because is convenient for us as 'social' being, never mind what tribe er are from, we come up with universal moral laws that permeate societies around the world. If that is not faith or a belief system I don't know what is.

[AxeMan0170]

@OxiMiracle a variety of the biggest animals on earth, and of course random chance would permit for reptiles to dominate the earth.h) Random chance would cause for a meteorite to hit the earth thus eliminating dinosaurs.i) Random chance once again would cause for mammals to evolve faster and better than any other species on earth. j) once again chance and chance alone would permit for primates to evolve more than, say felines or canines.k) Natural selection is also a product of random chance.

[AxeMan0170]

@OxyMiracle d) once again, random chance and millions of years intervened so these aminoacids and proteins would combine themselves at the right levels. e) random chance once again produced a quite intricate and complex information string (DNA) that would allow for a 'simple' cell to be created. f)another few millions of years and random chance once again would plot to allow mitosis and life to explode on earth. g)evolution which works through random chance, would take care of producing (cont)